Abstract:Crowdsourcing offers a new way for mobilizing the collective intelligence and efforts of a large group of people to tackle tasks which cannot be efficiently performed by machines (e.g., video transcription, monitoring road conditions at specific locations) (Doan, Ramakrishnan, and Halevy 2011). Many commercial crowdsourcing platforms are now available. Their business depends on providing satisfactory services to both the crowdsourcers (i.e. task requesters) and the workers involved. From the crowdsourcers' perspective, they expect to receive high quality results for their crowd sourcing tasks in a timely manner. From the workers' perspective, they want to earn as much as possible while committing limited productive effort.As the crowdsourcers are the main source of revenue for crowdsourcing platforms, their requirements tend to take precedence over those of the workers. Many commercial crowdsourcing platforms have implemented some variants of reputation-based mechanisms (Yu et al. 2013a) to gauge the workers' competence based on their past performance, and allow only those with good reputations to access tasks.While this simple reputation-based task delegation method is intuitive and has its own merits, a different, albeit related problem, has not received much attention. As crowd sourcing workers are human beings, they have limited availability and productive capacities to work on tasks delegated to them (Yu et al. 2012). Concentrating requests to workers with good reputations may result in details. In addition, as a small portion of reputable workers become overloaded with task requests while others remain relatively idle, attrition may occur in the worker population, thereby leaving the crowdsourcing platform with a shortage of workers.The potentially conflicting objectives between crowdsourcers and workers can be formalized under the congestion game framework (Monderer and Shapley 1996). In congestion games, the payoff for each player depends on the resources it selects and the number of other players selecting the same resources. For instance, the morning commute to work places by many people can be modeled as a congestion game. The time taken by a traveller on a given day depends on how many others are taking the same route as him.

"The Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts": Optimization in Collaborative Crowdsourcing

Task Assignment with Guaranteed Quality for Crowdsourcing Platforms.

Matchmaker: Stable Task Assignment with Bounded Constraints for Crowdsourcing Platforms

Optimizing Open-Ended Crowdsourcing: The Next Frontier in Crowdsourced Data Management

An Evolutionary And Automated Virtual Team Making Approach For Crowdsourcing Platforms

Profit Maximization in Mobile Crowdsourcing: A Competitive Analysis

Crowdsourcing Team Formation With Worker-Centered Modeling

Globally Optimal Crowdsourcing Quality Management

Infusing Human Factors Into Algorithmic Crowdsourcing

Algorithmic Management for Improving Collective Productivity in Crowdsourcing

Optimizing Worker Selection in Collaborative Mobile Crowdsourcing

Crowdmerge: Achieving Optimal Crowdsourcing Quality Management By Sequent Merger

Stackelberg Game Based Optimal Workload Allocation and Pricing Mechanism in Crowdsourcing

Optimizing Collaborative Crowdsensing: A Graph Theoretical Approach to Team Recruitment and Fair Incentive Distribution

Scalable Urban Mobile Crowdsourcing

Tuning Crowdsourced Human Computation

Profit Optimization in Spatial Crowdsourcing: Effectiveness and Efficiency

Optimized Execution of Business Processes on Crowdsourcing Platforms.

Complementing Solutions To Optimization Problems Via Crowdsourcing On Video Game Plays

Discovering And Managing Social Compositions In Collaborative Enterprise Crowdsourcing Systems

A Self-organizing Collaborative Crowdsourcing Framework for Improving Service Utility