Abstract:Functional programs typically interact with stateful libraries that hide state behind typed abstractions. One particularly important class of applications are data structure implementations that rely on such libraries to provide a level of efficiency and scalability that may be otherwise difficult to achieve. However, because the specifications of the methods provided by these libraries are necessarily general and rarely specialized to the needs of any specific client, any required application-level invariants must often be expressed in terms of additional constraints on the (often) opaque state maintained by the library. In this paper, we consider the specification and verification of such representation invariants using symbolic finite automata (SFA). We show that SFAs can be used to succinctly and precisely capture fine-grained temporal and data-dependent histories of interactions between functional clients and stateful libraries. To facilitate modular and compositional reasoning, we integrate SFAs into a refinement type system to qualify stateful computations resulting from such interactions. The particular instantiation we consider, Hoare Automata Types (HATs), allows us to both specify and automatically type-check the representation invariants of a datatype, even when its implementation depends on stateful library methods that operate over hidden state. We also develop a new bidirectional type checking algorithm that implements an efficient subtyping inclusion check over HATs, enabling their translation into a form amenable for SMT-based automated verification. We present extensive experimental results on an implementation of this algorithm that demonstrates the feasibility of type-checking complex and sophisticated HAT-specified OCaml data structure implementations.

A Falsification View of Success Typing

Towards Tree Automata-based Success Types

Securing c programs by dynamic type checking

Trust, but Verify: Two-Phase Typing for Dynamic Languages

Static Blame for gradual typing

Closing the Gap -- Formally Verifying Dynamically Typed Programs like Statically Typed Ones Using Hoare Logic -- Extended Version --

Testing by Dualization

Semantic-Type-Guided Bug Finding

A HAT Trick: Automatically Verifying Representation Invariants Using Symbolic Finite Automata

The Combinatorics of Falsification and Hypothesis Testing

Your Proof Fails? Testing Helps to Find the Reason

Focusing on Refinement Typing

Extended Paper: API-driven Program Synthesis for Testing Static Typing Implementations

Type checking data structures more complex than trees

Fix Your Types

How Are Programs Found? Speculating About Language Ergonomics With Curry-Howard

Falsification of Cyber-Physical Systems with Robustness-Guided Black-Box Checking

Proving and Disproving Equivalence of Functional Programming Assignments

Parallel and Multi-Objective Falsification with Scenic and VerifAI

Schematic Program Proofs with Abstract Execution

Inferring Non-Failure Conditions for Declarative Programs