Abstract:REALISTIC MODELING OF CHAMBER TRANSPORT FOR HEAVY-ION FUSION* W. M. Sharp, D. P. Grote, D. A. Callahan, M. Tabak, LLNL, Livermore, CA 94550, USA E. Henestroza, S. S. Yu, LBNL, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA P. F. Peterson, U C Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, Mission Research Corporation, Abluquerque, NM 87110, USA Abstract RESULTS Transport of intense heavy-ion beams to an inertial- fusion target after final focus is simulated here using a realistic computer model. It is found that passing the beam through a rarefied plasma layer before it enters the fusion chamber can largely neutralize the beam space charge and lead to a usable focal spot for a range of ion species and input conditions. Parameters The power profile required by the point-design target is built up using beams with different durations, currents, energies, and arrival times, as sketched in Fig. 1. A total of 120 beams is specified, divided into five classes. The lower-energy foot is built up by stacking three types of beam, and the main pulse is formed from two more types. The large number is needed both to keep the current in each beam manageable and to give each type of beam adequate azimuthal symmetry when deposited in the annuli on the target ends. The point design specifies beams of singly charged bismuth ions (209 amu). However, the simulations here also model beams of xenon (131 amu) to test the sensitivity of the beam focal radius to ion mass. Since target stopping power is principally a function of ion velocity, the energy of ions is roughly proportional to atomic mass M, and beam current increases inversely with M . The beam perveance, which is a measure of the importance of space charge in transverse dynamics, increases like M -2 . To have the required stopping power, bismuth main-pulse ions require an energy of 4 GeV, while xenon ions must have 2.5 GeV. Foot pulse energies are 25% lower. Due to their higher power, the initial foot pulses and the final 48 main pulses are the most challenging to focus, so the beam parameters used here match those two types. These main-pulse beam currents INTRODUCTION To achieve high gain, indirect-drive targets for heavy- ion fusion must be driven by a tailored input-energy profile.[1] This profile is designed to launch a series of four shocks through the capsule that compress and accelerate the fuel on a low adiabat. The pulse shape typically consists of a long (~ 25 ns), low-power “foot” that heats the hohlraum interior to about 100 eV and launches the first shock. The power is then ramped to the peak value and held for about 8 ns as the subsequent three shocks are launched. The hohlraum geometry and the required temperature history of the capsule determine the ion-beam current profile. In addition, distributed-radiator targets [2,3] require different ion kinetic energies in the foot and main pulses to compensate for ion range shortening as the hohlraum is heated, and the beam energy must be deposited in an annular region on each end of the 5-mm-radius cylindrical target to produce the necessary radiation symmetry inside the hohlraum. These target requirements put tight constraints on the number, current, and focal radius of the drive beams. A point design meeting these constraints has recently been worked out [4]. In this paper, we use the electromagnetic particle-in-cell code LSP [5,6] to investigate the chamber transport of the foot and main- pulse beams of this design. The single-beam simulations here include beam neutralization by plasma injected into the chamber-entry beam line, collisional ionization of the beam and background gas, and photoionization by X rays from the heated target. The results both demonstrate the viability of the point design and explore the effects of the initial emittance and convergence angle of the beam, the choice of ion species, and the spatial profile of the neutralizing plasma. This work was performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contracts W-7405-ENG-48 and DE-AC03-76SF00098. Figure 1: Power deposited on the fusion target by 120 ion beams. Numbers in parentheses give the number of beams of each type.

Uniformity of fuel target implosion in Heavy Ion Fusion

Model Optimization of Infrared Homogenization for Inertial Confinement Fusion Cryotargets

Impurity Mode Induced Turbulent Particle Transport and Its Temperature Screening Effect

Fuel Pellet Alignment in Heavy-Ion Inertial Fusion Reactor

Toward inertial confinement fusion energy based on heavy ion beam

Researches on a reactor core in heavy ion inertial fusion

Main Drive Optimization of a High-Foot Pulse Shape in Inertial Confinement Fusion Implosions

The Role of Hot Spot Mix in the Low-Foot and High-Foot Implosions on the NIF

Mo-2 ACTIVITIES ON HEAVY ION INERTIAL FUSION AND BEAM-DRIVEN HIGH ENERGY DENSITY SCIENCE IN JAPAN

OVERVIEW OF U.S. HEAVY ION FUSION SCIENCE PROGRAM

Realistic Modeling of Chamber Transport for Heavy-Ion Fusion

Achieving global thermal uniformity of a compact cylindrical deuterium-tritium target

How Shock ignition can help to overcome the negative effects of hot electrons in direct-drive high-gain inertial confinement fusion

A Near One-Dimensional Indirectly Driven Implosion at Convergence Ratio 30

A Hybrid-Drive Nonisobaric-Ignition Scheme For Inertial Confinement Fusion

Characteristic and Impact of Kinetic Effects at Interfaces of Inertial Confinement Fusion Hohlraums

Effect of 'wandering' and other features of energy transfer by fast electrons in a direct-drive inertial confinement fusion target

A wedged-peak-pulse design with medium fuel adiabat (entropy) for indirect-drive fusion

Reduction of the deceleration phase to mitigate the negative effect of hydrodynamic instabilities in direct-drive ICF implosions

Quantitative observation of monochromatic X-rays emitted from implosion hotspot in high spatial resolution in inertial confinement fusion

Implosion of a Large Spherical Void