Adaptive behavior can produce maladaptive anxiety due to individual differences in experience

Frazer Meacham,Carl T. Bergstrom
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1501.03205
2016-06-08
Abstract:Normal anxiety is considered an adaptive response to the possible presence of danger, but is susceptible to dysregulation. Anxiety disorders are prevalent at high frequency in contemporary human societies, yet impose substantial disability upon their sufferers. This raises a puzzle: why has evolution left us vulnerable to anxiety disorders? We develop a signal detection model in which individuals must learn how to calibrate their anxiety responses: they need to learn which cues indicate danger in the environment. We derive the optimal strategy for doing so, and find that individuals face an inevitable exploration-exploitation tradeoff between obtaining a better estimate of the level of risk on one hand, and maximizing current payoffs on the other. Because of this tradeoff, a subset of the population can become trapped in a state of self-perpetuating over-sensitivity to threatening stimuli, even when individuals learn optimally. This phenomenon arises because when individuals become too cautious, they stop sampling the environment and fail to correct their misperceptions, whereas when individuals become too careless they continue to sample the environment and soon discover their mistakes. Thus, over-sensitivity to threats becomes common whereas under-sensitivity becomes rare. We suggest that this process may be involved in the development of excessive anxiety in humans.
Populations and Evolution,Neurons and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is why evolution makes humans so susceptible to anxiety disorders. Specifically, although normal anxiety is considered an adaptive response to potential danger, excessive or dysregulated anxiety can lead to serious mental illnesses, namely anxiety disorders. These disorders are very common in contemporary human society and cause significant dysfunctions for patients. This raises a question: Since anxiety itself is an adaptive mechanism, why hasn't evolution fully optimized this mechanism and instead made people prone to anxiety disorders? To explore this issue, the authors developed a signal - detection model to simulate how individuals calibrate their anxiety responses through learning. They found that under the trade - off between exploration and exploitation, even if individuals adopt the optimal learning strategy, there will still be a part of the population trapped in a self - maintaining state of being overly sensitive to threats. This is because when individuals become too cautious, they will stop exploring the environment and thus cannot correct their misperceptions; when individuals become too careless, they continue to explore the environment and will soon find that they have made mistakes. Therefore, being overly sensitive to threats becomes common, while being insensitive to threats becomes rare. The main contribution of the paper lies in providing an explanation for why, even in the case of optimal behavior, certain mechanisms in the evolutionary process may still lead to excessive anxiety reactions in some parts of the population. This phenomenon may be involved in the development process of excessive anxiety in humans.