Survival of Children With Critical Congenital Heart Defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Nina E. Forestieri,Andrew F. Olshan,Matthew E. Oster,Elizabeth C. Ailes,Michael P. Fundora,Sarah C. Fisher,Charles Shumate,Paul A. Romitti,Rebecca F. Liberman,Wendy N. Nembhard,Suzan L. Carmichael,Tania A. Desrosiers,The National Birth Defects Prevention Study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.2394
2024-09-13
Birth Defects Research
Abstract:Background Critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. This study estimated survival of children with nonsyndromic CCHDs and evaluated relationships between exposures of interest and survival by CCHD severity (univentricular or biventricular function). Methods This analysis included 4380 infants with CCHDs (cases) born during 1999–2011 and enrolled in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a multisite, population‐based case–control study of major birth defects. Cases were linked to state death files. Nonparametric Kaplan–Meier survival functions were used to estimate 1‐ and 5‐year survival probabilities overall and by severity group (univentricular/biventricular) stratified by demographic and clinical exposure variables of interest. The log‐rank test was used to determine whether stratified survival curves were equivalent. Survival and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also estimated using Cox proportional hazards modeling adjusted for maternal age, education, race/ethnicity, study site, and birth year. Results One‐ and five‐year survival rates were 85.8% (CI 84.7–86.8) and 83.7% (CI 82.5–84.9), respectively. Univentricular 5‐year survival was lower than biventricular case survival [65.3% (CI 61.7–68.5) vs. 89.0% (CI 87.8–90.1; p
toxicology,developmental biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?