Survival outcomes of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma by primary metastatic site: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database study.

Shannon Bagot,Veronica Rasmusen,Sarah Kim,Amir A. Rahnemai-Azar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.200
IF: 45.3
2024-02-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:200 Background: Prostatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of different sites of primary metastasis on overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic PAC as well as identify risk factors that may impact prognosis. Methods: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 26,085 patients diagnosed with metastatic PAC between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed to assess OS. Primary metastatic sites included in the study were bone, brain, liver, or lung and patients with multiple metastatic sites were excluded. Kaplan-Meier curves and Univariate Cox Regression analyses were used to determine the effect of various primary metastatic sites on OS. Results: Of all PAC primary metastatic sites, bone was the largest group (n=25,421, 97.5%), followed by lung (n=423, 1.6%), liver (n=194, 0.7%), and brain (n=47, 0.2%). Cox Regression analysis of PAC patients found that primary liver metastasis was associated with worst OS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.785, p<.001) while primary lung metastasis had better OS (HR 0.738, p<.001) when compared to patients with primary bone metastasis. Further analysis of the bone metastasis group with Univariate Cox Regression models was performed to evaluate the impact of age, treatment type, and race on OS. Factors found to significantly decrease OS included diagnosis at or after age 70 (HR 1.536, p<.001) and treatment with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (HR 1.239, p<.001). Factors that significantly improved OS included treatment with radical prostatectomy (HR 0.222, p<.001) and radiation therapy (HR 0.872, p=.002). No significant improvement in OS was seen with systemic therapy. Regarding race, OS was observed to be higher among Hispanic (HR 0.911, p<.001) and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) (HR 0.773, p<.001) populations when compared to Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). No statistically significant difference in OS was found between NHW, Black, or American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) populations. Conclusions: Results of this study differ from previous publications that found no improvement in OS with radiation therapy and that identified AIAN race as a protective factor in PAC. These findings may inform future treatment of patients based on the site of primary metastasis and increase consideration of risk factors that can contribute to decreased survival.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?