Comparison of Two Aerodynamic Models for Projectile Trajectory Simulation

Nezar Sahbon,Michał Welcer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11030189

IF: 2.66

2024-02-29

Aerospace

Abstract:The accuracy of aerodynamically controlled guided projectile simulations is largely determined by the aerodynamic model employed in flight simulations which impacts vehicle interaction with the surrounding air. In this work, the performance of projectile path following with two distinct aerodynamic models is examined for their possible influence on trajectory following accuracy. The study incorporates the path following guidance algorithm, which enables the object to navigate along a predefined path. The simulation mathematical model is developed in the MATLAB/Simulink environment. In addition, by integrating the path-following algorithm with the two aerodynamic models, the dynamic behaviour of the aerodynamically controlled projectile can be compared. This allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the trajectory and the effects of each model on the desired flight path. Further research can explore the differences between the two models in greater detail and quantify their impact on unmanned projectile trajectory predictions, in addition to further exploring the specific characteristics and limitations of each model. This will involve analysing their assumptions, computational methods, and inputs to identify potential sources of error or uncertainty in the simulations. Moreover, these results have important implications for the design of aerodynamically controlled projectiles as well as a deeper understanding of aerodynamic mathematical modelling in flight simulation.

engineering, aerospace

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper mainly discusses the performance comparison of two different aerodynamic models in simulating ballistic trajectories. In this study, the author established a flight simulation mathematical model in the MATLAB/Simulink environment and combined it with a path tracking algorithm to evaluate the influence of these two independent aerodynamic models on trajectory tracking accuracy. The paper points out that accurate aerodynamic models are crucial for the trajectory accuracy, stability, and maneuverability of aircraft such as unmanned projectiles.

Between traditional methods (such as wind tunnel experiments) and modern numerical methods (such as Computational Fluid Dynamics, CFD), the study chose DATCOM (Data Compendium) as a semi-empirical method due to its ability to rapidly estimate aerodynamic coefficients, which is suitable for quick comparison of different models. In the study, the author placed an improved bullet model with leading edge flaps in the MATLAB/Simulink environment and compared it using two aerodynamic models (classical model and improved model). The classical model is based on basic aerodynamic principles, while the improved model considers the periodic effects of control surface dynamics and abnormal flight conditions to improve the accuracy of predicting maneuverability and response to control inputs.

The subsequent parts of the paper detail the construction of the flight simulation model, including the modeling of environmental factors such as gravity, atmosphere, and wind, a detailed description of the two aerodynamic models, and the implementation of the control system. The author also formulated research scenarios, conducted result demonstration and discussion, in order to deeply understand the influence of each model on flight trajectory and performance, and provide a basis for further optimization of aerodynamic control in the design of unmanned projectiles.

In summary, this paper aims to improve the understanding of aerodynamic models in flight simulation by comparing two aerodynamic models, identify potential inaccuracies and uncertainties, and promote research progress in related fields.