Abstract:Historical analysis of the evolution of science policy for high‐energy physics from 1947–1967 shows how national security concerns played a role in this branch of fundamental science. The Manhattan Engineer District (MED) of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers supported particle accelerators after World War II demonstrated the military utility of particle accelerator technology for isotope separation, the transferability of technological skills from accelerator building to other technologies such as radar development, and the usefulness of particle accelerators in making the physical measurements required in the early stages of the design of nuclear weapons. Although the Atomic Energy Commission initially was disinclined to support further particle accelerator development, it was persuaded to support accelerator projects to advance understanding of the nuclear forces that underlay fission and other nuclear processes, to promote the health of the AEC Laboratories, and to ensure a supply of trained scientific personnel. The bond between accelerator development and national security tightened during the Korean War an AEC‐Department of Defense (DoD) program studied uses of accelerators for defense and to produce nuclear materials. Accelerators contributed to another form of national security: national prestige in the international technological competition with the Soviet Union under the Atoms for Peace program and after the President's Scientific Advisory Committee (PSAC) was created in 1958 to respond to Sputnik. Particle accelerators also continued to develop in the AEC weapons laboratories up to the new emphasis placed on them by the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO). Links to national security concerns helped programs traditionally thought to be “pure” science efforts win support, and applications from such programs found their way into applied programs.

National security and national innovation systems

National Innovation Systems and Innovation in Nations

Contribution of Science and Technology to the Country’s National Security

System-on-System Competition in Defense Innovation

Indigenous Innovation,National Security and Great Country Strategy

Addressing Evolving National Security Concerns Associated with Adversarial Capital in the United States: CFIUS, the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act, Critical Technology, Infrastructure, Sensitive Data, Section 1758 Technologies under the Export Control Act, and Team Telecom

A review on the researches of national innovational system: Theory and policy

On Collaborative Innovation Mechanism of National Defense Science and Technology Industry in China

Economics in the U.S. national security system

Economic theory and government technology policy

The US National Security State and Big Tech: frenemy relations and innovation planning in turbulent times*

Assessing the Dual Innovation Capability of National Innovation System: Empirical Evidence from 65 Countries

Analytical innovation in intelligence systems: the US national security establishment and the craft of ‘net assessment’

Accelerators and national security the evolution of science policy for high‐energy physics, 1947–1967

America, Jump-Started: World War II R&D and the Takeoff of the US Innovation System

Economic security in the national security system

Innovation policy responses to address vulnerabilities of national innovation systems: long-lasting impacts of COVID-19

You Work for Us Now: Concentration in University-Performed Defense R&D

National Security: Concept, Measurement and Management

Science and Technology Policy in Interdependent Economies

National security and the international regime of foreign direct investment: modern challenges and prospects