Abstract:Background: Pay-for-performance initiatives have been suggested as a way to improve the quality of patient care and provide incentives to improve providers' performance. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has endorsed such programs to improve quality of care. Objective: To examine the state of quality initiatives endorsed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in which institutions, provider groups, and physicians are awarded incentives based on adherence to composite metrics. Method: A literature search was conducted using the keywords "pay-for-performance," "quality improvement," "medical errors," and "physician incentive plans." Results: Although quality of care has improved in healthcare settings that engage in pay-for-performance initiatives, what can be attributed to payer-incentive programs is uncertain. Studies demonstrate that, of the 25 hospitals classified by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to be in the lowest decile of quality improvements, all still made significant progress in adhering to quality metrics after participation in the study. Financial rewards, however, were distributed based on a predetermined threshold established by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to be given only to participants who fell in the top 2 deciles. Penalties were incurred by the 51 hospitals that were within the bottom 2 deciles despite making substantial improvements. At such institutions, large minority communities and Medicaid populations comprise the patient populations. Other pay-for-performance schemes, such as employer-based purchasing, consumer health-spending accounts, and collaborative groups, were studied, with little data to support definite benefits. Conclusions: Examining rates of improvement in adherence to pay-for-performance initiatives when determining how to distribute financial rewards should be studied alongside the current classification by absolute deciles. By rewarding rates of improvement, potential elimination of quality disparities for hospitals that serve large Medicaid and minority populations can be achieved, because such organizations are encouraged to invest in quality improvement as a result of substantial progress made. Although alternative strategies like employer-driven value-based purchasing and collaboratives seem promising, the long-term effects of such initiatives still need to be studied. Creating greater financial incentives for individual providers to participate in pay-for-performance programs for many years to come will remain a challenge.

Finance issue brief: health care claims payment: prompt payment: year end report-2003

The check is in the mail: determinants of claims payable timing among health maintenance organizations

Prompt pay statutes for physicians' billing claims: an imperfect remedy for a systemic problem

Navigating payment pitfalls in managed care

Episode-Based Payment and Direct Employer Purchasing of Healthcare Services: Recent Bundled Payment Innovations and the Geisinger Health System Experience

Balance Billing by Health Care Providers: Assessing Consumer Protections Across States

The Policy Alliance Between Hospitals and Debt Collection Agencies: Content Analysis of Public Comments on Regulations on Billing and Collections

Recent developments in federal reimbursement for home health-care services and products

Addressing medical coding and billing part II: a strategy for achieving compliance. A risk management approach for reducing coding and billing errors

Recent hospital charity care controversies highlight ambiguities and outdated features of government regulations

Bending the curve through health reform implementation

Skilled Nursing and Home Health Policy: A Primer for the Hospital Clinician

Current issues in pharmaceutical reimbursement

Best practice in unbilled account management: one medical center's story

Ethics in Practice: Managed Care and the Changing Health Care Environment

Billing for Electronic Patient-Physician Communications: An Ethical Analysis

Organizing Uninsured Safety-Net Access to Specialist Physician Services

Pay-for-Performance Initiatives: Modest Benefits for Improving Healthcare Quality

Integrated Health and Social Care in the United States: A Decade of Policy Progress

The journey to patient financial engagement: Lessons learned

Effect of Medicare's nonpayment for Hospital-Acquired Conditions: lessons for future policy