Abstract:The United States has not suffered significant psychosocial or medical consequences from the use of biological weapons within its territories. This has contributed to a "natural" state of denial at the community level. This denial could amplify the sense of crisis, anxiety, fear, chaos, and disorder that would accompany such a bioterrorist event. A key part of primary prevention involves counteracting this possibility before an incident occurs. Doing so will require realistic information regarding the bioterrorism threat followed by the development of a planned response and regular practice of that response. Unlike in natural disasters or other situations resulting in mass casualties, emergency department physicians or nurses and primary care physicians (working in concert with epidemiologic agencies), rather than police, firemen, or ambulance personnel, will be most likely to first identify the unfolding disaster associated with a biological attack. Like community leaders, this group of medical responders must be aware of its own susceptibility to mental health sequelae and performance decrement as the increasing demands of disaster response outpace the availability of necessary resources. A bioterrorist attack will necessitate treatment of casualties who experience neuropsychiatric symptoms and syndromes. Although symptoms may result from exposure to infection with specific biological agents, similar symptoms may result from the mere perception of exposure or arousal precipitated by fear of infection, disease, suffering, and death. Conservative use of psychotropic medications may reduce symptoms in exposed and uninfected individuals, as may cognitive-behavioral interventions. Clear, consistent, accessible, reliable, and redundant information (received from trusted sources) will diminish public uncertainty about the cause of symptoms that might otherwise prompt persons to seek unnecessary treatment. Training and preparation for contingencies experienced in an attack have the potential to enhance delivery of care. Initiating supportive social, psychotherapeutic, and psychopharmacologic treatments judiciously for symptoms and syndromes known to accompany the traumatic stress response can aid the efficient treatment of some patients and reduce long-term morbidity in affected individuals. Preventive strategies and planning must take into account the idea that specific groups within the population are at higher risk for psychiatric morbidity. First responders comprise one group at psychologic risk in this situation, and healthcare providers comprise another. These and other high-risk groups will benefit from the same supportive interventions developed for the community as a whole.

Communicating health information to an alarmed public facing a threat such as a bioterrorist attack

Enhancing global health communication during a crisis: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Predicting response to reassurances and uncertainties in bioterrorism communications for urban populations in New York and California

An innovative approach to training hospital-based clinicians for bioterrorist attacks

Communicating the risks of bioterrorism and other emergencies in a diverse society: a case study of special populations in North Dakota

Crisis Communication and Public Perception of COVID-19 Risk in the Era of Social Media

Online bioterrorism continuing medical education: development and preliminary testing

Community reaction to bioterrorism: prospective study of simulated outbreak

Preparing our public health nursing leaders with informatics skills to combat bioterrorism in the United States

The impact of communication materials on public responses to a radiological dispersal device (RDD) attack

Emergency mental health management in bioterrorism events

Development of an on-line bioterrorism preparedness course

The media risk of infodemic in public health emergencies: Consequences and mitigation approaches

Public Understanding of Ebola Risks: Mastering an Unfamiliar Threat

Exposure to bioterrorism and mental health response among staff on Capitol Hill

Infectious diseases and governance of global risks through public communication and participation

[Role of mass media during the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic]

Cyberchondria, Coronavirus, and Cybercrime

Communication failure in the prehospital response to major terrorist attacks: lessons learned and future directions

Pandemics and PSAs: Rapidly Changing Information in a New Media Landscape

Media exposure to bioterrorism: stress and the anthrax attacks