Abstract:Background: Risk stratification in Brugada syndrome (BrS) is based on the occurrence of dynamic factors, such as unexplained syncope and documentation of spontaneous type 1 pattern. At odds with other channelopathies, the role of nonmodifiable risk factors such as sex or genetics remains uncertain. Objectives: This study aims to identify nonmodifiable risk factors for the occurrence of life-threatening arrhythmic events (LAEs) and define their clinical utility. Methods: Clinical and genetic data from consecutive, unrelated Italian patients with Brugada syndrome screened on the sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5 (SCN5A) gene and 3 pivotal single-nucleotide variations (formerly single-nucleotide polymorphisms) associated with BrS (rs11708996, rs10428132, and rs9388451) were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results: In 2,182 unrelated patients with BrS (81% males; median age at diagnosis: 41.6 years [Q1-Q3: 33.4-50.3 years]), male sex (HR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.9-6.9; P = 0.0001), missense SCN5A mutations in BrS-enriched domains (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2-4.3; P = 0.008), nonmissense SCN5A mutations (HR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.8-5.7; P < 0.001), and polygenic risk score for BrS (HR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0-1.6; P = 0.041) were all independently associated with a significantly higher risk of a first LAE since birth. Based on these results, we derived the nonmodifiable risk of each patient with BrS, and the division of nonmodifiable risk into tertiles identified 3 distinct risk profiles. In an analysis at follow-up, nonmodifiable risk was independently associated with LAE at follow-up (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-2.7; P = 0.014), alongside classical predictors including: history of LAE before diagnosis (HR: 13.8; 95% CI: 8.1-23.7; P < 0.0001), history of unexplained syncope before diagnosis (HR: 4.1; 95% CI: 2.4-6.8; P < 0.0001), and spontaneous type 1 pattern at diagnosis (HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.8; P = 0.010). The model was internally validated, and we derived the equation permitting to calculate the granular 5-year risk of experiencing an LAE at follow-up for each patient with BrS, which may be used to facilitate clinical decision-making. Conclusions: Our data show that male sex, type of SCN5A mutation, and polygenic risk score for BrS define the nonmodifiable risk of each patient with BrS. Nonmodifiable risk is independently associated with LAE, regardless of symptoms or pattern type.

Decreased nocturnal standard deviation of averaged NN intervals. An independent marker to identify patients at risk in the Brugada Syndrome

Differences in 12-lead electrocardiogram between symptomatic and asymptomatic Brugada syndrome patients

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of the S CN5A Gene in Han Chinese and Their Relation with Brugada Syndrome

Long-term follow-up of patients with Brugada syndrome: Foremost risk factors associated with overall arrhythmic events

Temporal Variability in Electrocardiographic Indices in Subjects With Brugada Patterns

Ventricular conduction delay as marker of risk in Brugada Syndrome. Results from the analysis of clinical and electrocardiographic features of a large cohort of patients

Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Brugada Syndrome Type I During Exercise Stress Test

Territory-wide cohort study of Brugada syndrome in Hong Kong: predictors of long-term outcomes using random survival forests and non-negative matrix factorisation

Nonmodifiable Risk Factors Predict Outcomes in Brugada Syndrome

Twelve-Lead ECG, Holter Monitoring Parameters, and Genetic Testing in Brugada Syndrome: Insights from Analysis of Multigenerational Family with a History of Sudden Cardiac Arrest during Physical Activity

Non-invasive cardiac activation mapping and identification of severity of epicardial substrate in Brugada Syndrome: a case report

Prognostic parameters predict cardiac events in Brugada syndrome: a meta-analysis

Simulation of Brugada Syndrome Using Cellular and Three-Dimensional Whole-Heart Modeling Approaches

Exercise-Induced QRS Prolongation in Brugada Syndrome: Implications for Improving Disease Phenotyping and Diagnosis

Late life‐threatening arrhythmia in patients with Brugada syndrome: Results from long‐term follow‐up in a large Japanese cohort

Implantable loop recorders in patients with Brugada syndrome: the BruLoop study

Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with Brugada syndrome: A multicenter retrospective study

Predicting ventricular arrhythmia inducibility in ajmaline‐induced Brugada type I pattern: Validation of the dST‐Tiso interval

Brugada syndrome: identification of subjects at risk and therapy

Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Brugada Syndrome in Taiwan

Continuous Rhythm Monitoring With Implanted Loop Recorders in Children and Adolescents With Brugada Syndrome