Abstract:Background: GP referrals to secondary care are an important factor in the cost of running the NHS. The known variation in referral rates between doctors has the potential to cause tension within primary care which will be exacerbated by the latest reorganization of primary care and the trend towards capitation-based budgets. The importance of postgraduate learning for GPs has been recognized; continuing professional development is moving towards self-directed practice-based learning programmes. Educational interventions have been shown to alter doctors' prescribing behaviour. This, together with the pressure on accounting for referral activity, makes the prospect of improving, and possibly reducing, referral activity through educational interventions very attractive. Objectives: This study complemented a randomized controlled trial (RCT) which investigated whether an intervention of the type which had reduced prescribing costs would have a similar effect on referral activity. Methods: The context of the study, description of the characteristics of the practice and the issues seen as important by the doctors and practice manager were identified through preliminary semi-structured interviews. The practice then held a series of educational in-practice meetings to discuss referrals and issues arising from referrals. The audio- and videotaped transcripts were interpreted using content and group dynamic analysis. Participants commented upon our preliminary findings. In addition, we used dimensional analysis to induce a preliminary theory describing the effect of the intervention on this general practice which enabled us to review the findings of the parallel RCT. The educational value of the meetings and the learning needs of the participants were also assessed. Results: Our complementary study showed no alteration of practice referral rates following the educational intervention. The qualitative study, unencumbered by the assumptions inherent in the development of the hypothesis tested in the RCT, highlighted the complexity of decision making in general practice and the likely impact of historical background and a variety of internal and external pressures on this self-directive educational intervention. The practice members described the individual and group learning needs identified as a result of the meetings. Conclusion: The findings of this study raise important questions for developing practice-based learning. The outcomes of self-directive interventions in practices will be influenced by internal and external events both past and present. Such outcomes may be qualitative and difficult to measure. They are likely to differ from outcomes seen when interventions are applied to groups of doctors who are not all members of the same practice.

Do budget-holding physicians respond to price? the case of fundholding in the UK

Physician Response to Prices of Other Physicians: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Physicians' views on pay-for-performance as a reimbursement model: a quantitative study among Dutch surgical physicians

Identifying policies and strategies for general practitioner retention in direct patient care in the United Kingdom: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method panel study

Willingness to pay for private primary care services in Hong Kong: are elderly ready to move from the public sector?

Exploring physician agency under demand‐side cost sharing—An experimental approach

Reconsidering the role of private health funds in Australia: a dynamic model

Universal coverage and cost control: the United Kingdom National Health Service

Encouraging Preventive Services in Primary Care Through Payment Schemes.

Testing the myth of fee-for-service and overprovision in health care

Referrals and relationships: in-practice referrals meetings in a general practice

"It's not a one operation fits all": A qualitative study exploring fee setting and participation in price transparency initiatives amongst medical specialists in the Australian private healthcare sector

Competition and supplier-induced demand in a health care system with fixed fees

Why Junior Doctors Don’t Want to Become General Practitioners: A Discrete Choice Experiment from the MABEL Longitudinal Study of Doctors

Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments

Physician responses to insurance benefit restrictions: The case of ophthalmology

Where do UK clinicians find information at the point of care? A pragmatic, exploratory study

Changes in publicly and privately funded care in England following a national programme to reduce provision of low-value elective surgery

Perceptions of the impact of primary care organizations on GP prescribing: the iron fist in the velvet glove?

Strategic behaviour and decision making in competitive hospital markets: an experimental investigation