Revisiting trait and state predictors of nightmare frequency and nightmare distress.

William E. Kelly,John R. Mathe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/drm0000266
IF: 2.212
2024-03-21
Dreaming
Abstract:Previous research has yielded mixed results as to whether state or trait factors best predict nightmare frequency and nightmare distress. Several previous studies examining state and trait factors have included psychological distress as a state factor while neuroticism, absorption, and psychological boundaries have been included as trait factors. Using a sample of 166 university students, the current study extends previous research by including other trait factors recently found to be important in predicting nightmares—ego strength, emotional dysregulation, and nightmare proneness—in addition to neuroticism, boundaries, and absorption. Regression results found that trait variables combined to account for significant variance in nightmare frequency and nightmare distress above state factors. Nightmare frequency was best accounted for by nightmare proneness and psychological boundaries. Nightmare distress was best accounted for by ego strength and emotional dysregulation. State distress did not independently predict nightmare distress or nightmare frequency after accounting for trait variables. The results and areas for future research are discussed.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?