Abstract:PURPOSE:To compare visual function in pseudophakic patients with bilateral implantation of Tecnis multifocal aspheric and conventional monofocal spherical intraocular lenses (IOL).METHODS:A prospective study of 100 consecutive cases (200 eyes) was conducted. All cataract patients underwent phacoemulsification were randomized to receive multifocal aspheric IOL (Tecnis ZM900, AMO, multifocal aspheric group) or conventional spherical IOL (Akreos Adapt, Bausch & Lomb, monofocal spherical group). The following investigations were performed to assess the uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuity of distance, intermediate and near distances, accommodative amplitude, spherical aberrations of total eye, contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity and near stereoacuity. Patients were surveyed for visual disturbances and lifestyle visual quality. The independent-samples t test was used to compare the measure data which met normal distribution and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the measure data which didn't meet. The chi-square test was applied to compare categorical variables.RESULTS:The uncorrected and distance-corrected bilateral visual acuity of multifocal aspheric group at 30 cm and 40 cm were 0.24 ± 0.12 and 0.22 ± 0.11 (logMAR), better than monofocal spherical group (Z = -8.261, P = 0.000; Z = -5.508, P = 0.000), but the visual acuity at other distances had no statistical difference between two groups. Patients with multifocal aspheric IOL had significantly higher accommodative amplitude than those with monofocal spherical IOL, improved about 2.3 ∼ 2.8 D (Z = -10.655, P = 0.000; Z = -2.709, P = 0.007). Mean spherical aberration of multifocal aspheric group was (0.027 ± 0.160) µm and (0.006 ± 0.083) µm, significantly lower than that of monofocal spherical group (0.269 ± 0.161) µm, (0.037 ± 0.205) µm at 5 mm and 3 mm pupil diameter (Z = -8.815, P = 0.000; Z = -2.791, P = 0.005). The difference of contrast sensitivity was not significant, but glare sensitivity was higher for monofocal spherical group than for multifocal aspheric group. Multifocal aspheric group showed statistically better uncorrected stereoacuity (72.4 ± 29.9)″ than monofocal spherical group (92.8 ± 35.7)″ (Z = -3.089, P = 0.002).CONCLUSIONS:The present clinical results demonstrated that Tecnis multifocal aspheric group had better near visual acuity, accommodative amplitude and near stereoacuity as compared to conventional monofocal spherical group. The aspheric design reduced spherical aberration of total eye and improved contrast sensitivity in some way.

A comparative study of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses combining bifocal and extended depth-of-focus profiles

Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity and Through Focus in Small-Aperture Inlay, Accommodating Intraocular Lens, or Multifocal Intraocular Lens Subjects

Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical performance after implantation of the Symfony extended depth of focus intraocular lens in the dominant eye and the Synergy presbyopia correcting intraocular lens in the non-dominant eye

Postoperative Visual Function of Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Versus Monofocal Lenses

[Binocular Clinical Comparison Study of Tecnis Multifocal Aspheric and Monofocal Spherical Intraocular Lenses].

Comparison of bilateral implantation of monofocal intraocular lenses with enhanced intermediate function targeting with − 2.00 D and emmetropia in moderate to high myopic Asian patients

Chromatic aberration and spectral dependency of extended-range-of-vision intraocular lens technology

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Echelette Extended Range of Vision and Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lenses

[Clinical comparison study of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses].

Binocular Visual Outcomes Comparison of Two Trifocal Intraocular Lenses in High-Myopic Cataract Patients: A 1-Year Multicenter Study

Comparison of trifocal or hybrid multifocal-extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of Objective and Subjective Visual Outcomes Between Pentafocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses

Prospective clinical study of a new intraocular lens with extended depth of focus: ISOPURE , 1 year follow‐up

Clinical Outcomes of a Trifocal Versus an Extended Depth of Field Intraocular Lens in Chinese Patients With Cataract: A Prospective Cohort Study

Comparison of Two Presbyopia-Correcting Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Study

Visual outcome and optical quality after implantation of zonal refractive multifocal and extended-range-of-vision IOLs: a prospective comparison

Comparison of the optical behaviour of five different multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses in a model eye

Comparison of visual performance between bifocal and extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses

Visual Performance with Accommodating and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Evaluation of extended depth-of-focus hydrophobic intraocular lens with an optic concept based on combination of high-order aberrations