Abstract:Implicit learning is integral to human cognition. It occurs during the learning phase (online periods) and the offline interval after the learning phase ( offline periods). The process during the offline periods is referred to as consolidation, which means stabilization or enhancement of a memory trace even without additional practice after the initial acquisition. Some studies have preliminarily explored the effect of sleep on the consolidation of perceptual and motor sequences in implicit learning. However, these studies have failed to achieve a complete separation of motor sequences and perceptual sequences, thus leaving open the question of whether the sequence type moderates the effects of sleep on the consolidation of implicit sequence learning. In addition, previous studies of explicit learning have found that sequences with long length and high complexity were more likely to benefit from sleep than simple sequences, showing a sleep-based offline consolidation effect. Therefore, the question of whether the effect of sleep on offline consolidation of implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences is moderated by sequence complexity remains unresolved. The present study addressed these issues through three experiments applying different sequence length levels and complexities using a modified version of the Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task, which allows independent manipulation of perceptual and motor sequences. Participants were instructed to press the corresponding key as quickly and accurately as possible according to which color of the target square was the same as that of the surrounding square. In the perceptual sequence group, the target square color followed a sequence, but the finger response orders were randomly assigned. The opposite was true for the motor sequence group. Subsequently, a prediction test was used to estimate the amount of possible explicit knowledge. Experiment 1 used a short six-element sequence with lower complexity and showed a more robust offline consolidation effect in the motor sequence group compared to the perceptual sequence group. However, sleep does not promote the offline consolidation of both sequences. In Experiment 2, a more complex sequence (sequence length 11) was used. The results showed that participants implicitly learned the motor sequence. In the motor sequence group, participants with sleep performed a better offline consolidation effect than those without sleep. However, participants neither implicitly acquired the sequence nor showed an offline consolidation effect in the perceptual sequence group. Participants performed a small or non-significant perceptual sequence learning effect in Experiments 1 and 2. Based on this result, the sleep-related offline consolidation of the perceptual sequence was further examined using a more simple sequence of length 4 in Experiment 3. The results showed that participants exhibited improvements in the performance of perceptual sequences learning, but no offline consolidation effect was observed in either group. The combined results of the three experiments showed that sleep does not promote the offline consolidation of perceptual sequences, regardless of the degree of difficulty. For motor sequences, the sequence learning effect significantly increased following sleep but not after waking when the sequence length was long and structural complexity was high. However, sleep-related offline improvements were absent when the sequence length was short. In conclusion, these results indicated that the offline consolidation of implicit sequence knowledge based on sleep is modulated by sequence type and sequence complexity.

Sleep benefits perceptual but not movement-based learning of locomotor sequences

Sleep and the consolidation of perceptual and motor sequences in implicit learning

0071 Does Additional Training on a Motor Sequence Task Improve Sleep-Dependent Memory Consolidation for Older Adults?

Sequence-specific delayed gains in motor fluency evolve after movement observation training in the absence of early sleep

Acquisition and consolidation of sequential footstep movements with physical and motor imagery practice

Daytime sleep enhances consolidation of the spatial but not motoric representation of motor sequence memory

Sleep improves accuracy, but not speed, of generalized motor learning in young and older adults and in individuals with Parkinson's disease

Shaping the structural dynamics of motor learning through cueing during sleep

Changing Sleep Architecture through Motor Learning: Influences of a Trampoline Session on REM Sleep Parameters

Sleep consolidation potentiates skill maintenance

Neural mechanisms associated with sleep‐dependent enhancement of motor learning after brain injury

The Role of the Hippocampus in Consolidating Motor Learning during Wakefulness

Sleep does not influence schema-facilitated motor memory consolidation

Interaction between hippocampal and striatal systems predicts subsequent consolidation of motor sequence memory

Sensorimotor restriction affects sleep-related motor memory consolidation through altered slow oscillation–spindle coupling

Differential Effects of a Nap on Motor Sequence Learning-Related Functional Connectivity Between Young and Older Adults

Sleep Consolidation Potentiates Sensorimotor Adaptation

A single high-intensity exercise bout during early consolidation does not influence retention or relearning of sensorimotor locomotor long-term memories

A Daytime Nap Does Not Enhance the Retention of a First-Order or Second-Order Motor Sequence

Conserved Population Dynamics in the Cerebro-Cerebellar System between Waking and Sleep

Motor learning promotes regionally-specific spindle-slow wave coupled cerebral memory reactivation