Abstract:Introduction: Partnership for Patients (PfP) was a national initiative sponsored by the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, to reduce preventable hospital acquired conditions (HACs) by 40% and readmissions (within 30 days) by 20%, by the end of 2013 (as compared to the baseline of CY2010). Along with partners across the nation, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, Dr. Jonathan Woodson, pledged to support PfP in June 2011. Participation of the Military Health System (MHS) in PfP marked the implementation of the first enterprise-wide patient safety initiative. Materials and methods: Three phases of the MHS initiative were developed to meet the aims of the national PfP initiative: (1) Planning and Design, (2) Implementation, and (3) Monitoring and Sustainment. The Planning and Design phase focused on the identification of evidence-based practices (Table III); the development of implementation guides; the implementation of various communication, education, and improvement strategies; and the development of methods by which to track progress and share successes. The implementation phase focused on identifying roles and responsibilities across all levels of care; creating, disseminating, and implementing evidence-based practices at participating military treatment facilities; and establishing a structured learning action network. Finally, during the monitoring and sustainment phase, per the guidance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, an overall HAC rate was developed for quarterly analysis. The HAC rate per 1,000 dispositions (i.e., discharges) was an aggregate of all PfP HACs. Using the HAC rate, the improvement rate was calculated by comparing the current quarter's HAC rate to the baseline (CY2010). This allowed the MHS to track the overall progress across the enterprise. Results: The MHS achieved a number of accomplishments, including a 15.8% cumulative reduction in HACs by the end of 2013, an 11.1% reduction in readmissions, avoided nearly 500 harm events since PfP implementation, and approximately $13.5 million in cost avoidance (on the basis of national cost estimate data available at the beginning of the PfP initiative). Conclusion: The two most critical lessons learned for the MHS during the PfP initiative are (1) continuous leadership engagement and inspection is vital to ensure field workers are engaged with safety and quality expectations and (2) applying a "one-size-fits-all" approach to improve a large delivery system is not effective. In addition, it is most impactful when local military treatment facility-level teams are involved in determining strategies to implement evidence-based standard processes and protocols that reduce variation when integrating practice change into daily operations. The MHS will continue to integrate PfP efforts into improvement activities by leveraging lessons learned from this initiative and determining how they can be applied to other areas of care and/or patient safety and quality initiatives. The Patient Safety Improvement Collaborative has committed to oversee and support the establishment and implementation of ongoing, focused patient safety and quality initiatives across the MHS using a collaborative vision to engage all levels of leadership and staff, and to ensure sustained improvements.

Enhancing Patient Transport Systems in the U.S. Department of Defense's National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) Pilot Program

Military-Civilian Partnership to Improve Combat Casualty Care Readiness Among Non-physician Providers

Optimizing Virtual Health Technologies Through a Performance-based Readiness Model: Lessons From the Field Deployment of National Emergency Tele-Critical Care Network

Leveraging the Partnership for Patients' Initiative to Improve Patient Safety and Quality Within the Military Health System

Distributed Maritime Operations and the Medical Challenge: How a Medical Common Operating Picture Can Help Bridge the Gap

Addressing Differences in Knowledge and Experience in Trauma Care Capabilities Among an International Team of Military Medical Care Providers in a Deployed Setting

Military medical surge capacity in times of war and natural disaster

National Disaster Medical System- Modernizing the NDMS Program in a Changing World

Preparing for the Future of Combat Casualty Care: Opportunities to Refine the Military Health System's Alignment with the National Defense Strategy

The 16-year evolution of a military-civilian partnership: The University of Alabama at Birmingham experience

P058: Improving patient safety and streamlining care at a community hospital through spread and scale of a trauma care bundle: a quality improvement pilot project

Enhancing the Management of Deployment-Limiting Medical Conditions in the U.S. Department of Navy Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Predictive Analytics Methods

Improving the Efficiency of a Military Treatment Facility Transfer Center Process

Strengthening Military Medical Provider Readiness: A Comprehensive Examination of VHA-MHS Partnerships

Sudden-Onset Disaster Mass-Casualty Incident Response: A Modified Delphi Study on Triage, Prehospital Life Support, and Processes

Navy En-Route Care in Future Distributed Maritime Operations: A Review of Clinician Capabilities and Roles of Care

Putting the ready in readiness: A post hoc analysis of surgeon performance during a military mass casualty situation in Afghanistan

Evaluation of Contingency Telemedical Support to Improve Casualty Care at a Simulated Military Intermediate Resuscitation Facility: The EM-ANGEL Study

The Readiness Imperative: Leveraging Large Animal Resident Research to Enhance Expeditionary Surgical Skills

National Emergency Tele-Critical Care in a Pandemic: Barriers and Solutions

Building a National Standard for Outreach and Assistance to At-Risk Patients During Large-Scale Disasters