The inhibiting effects of biochar-derived organic materials on rice production

Yanfang Feng,Huayong He,Lihong Xue,Yang Liu,Haijun Sun,Zhi Guo,Yueman Wang,Xuebo Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112909
IF: 8.7
2021-09-01
Journal of Environmental Management
Abstract:<p>The effects of PBC and HBC on rice production, NUE and corresponding mechanisms were examined. Six treatments, P05, P30, H05, H30 (P: PBC; H: HBC; 05 and 30 represented the application rate of 0.5 and 3.0% <em>w/w</em>), CKU (urea application without char) and CK (no application of char and urea), were set up. Results showed that P05, P30 and H05 increased grain yield by 1.8–7.3% (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05), whereas H30 reduced grain yield by 60.4% (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), compared to CKU. Meanwhile, HI under P05, P30 and H05 increased by 3.4–3.6%, while H30 decreased by 9.1% (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). NUE and NAE showed similar trends with rice yield. By investigation, the excessive introduction of BDOM plays a crucial role in the reduction of rice production and NUE under higher HBC application. GC-MS/MS analysis showed that the soluble BDOM of HBC and PBC was quite different, and compounds such as 2,6-dimethoxyphenol might stress rice growth. ESI-FT-ICR-MS analysis showed that the BDOM of HBC contained a certain quantity of aromatic compounds, which may also stress rice growth. Overall, HBC pretreatment should be conducted, and the application rate should be strictly controlled before its agricultural application.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the effects of two different types of biochar—pyrochar (PBC) and hydrochar (HBC)—on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and investigates the underlying mechanisms. The study conducted a field experiment to compare and analyze the impact of different application rates of PBC and HBC on rice growth. Specifically, the study set up six treatments, including different application rates of PBC and HBC (0.5% and 3.0%, by weight), as well as control groups with only urea application and no biochar or urea application. The results showed that at lower application rates (0.5%), both PBC and HBC significantly increased rice grain yield (1.8%-7.3%), but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). However, a higher application rate of HBC (3.0%) significantly reduced rice grain yield (60.4%, P<0.05). Additionally, the study found that the content of soluble biochar-derived organic matter (BDOM) in HBC was much higher than in PBC and contained different compounds, such as 2,6-dimethoxyphenol, which may negatively affect rice growth. Particularly, when the application rate of HBC was too high, rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency significantly decreased, possibly due to the stress effect caused by excessive BDOM on rice. In summary, the paper aims to address the following issues: comparing and evaluating the effects of different types of biochar (PBC and HBC) and their different application rates on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency, and exploring the underlying mechanisms, especially the role of BDOM in this process.