Abstract:The last decade has seen a surge of research activity on multiobjective optimization using evolutionary computation and a number of well performing algorithms have been published. The majority of these algorithms use fitness assignment based on Pareto-domination: Nondominated sorting, dominance counting, or identification of the nondominated solutions. The success of these algorithms indicates that this type of fitness is suitable for multiobjective problems, but so far the use of Paretobased fitness has lead to program run times in $O(GMN^{2})$, where $G$ is the number of generations, $M$ is the number of objectives, and $N$ is the population size. The $N^{2}$ factor should be reduced if possible, since it leads to long processing times for large population sizes. This paper presents a new and efficient algorithm for nondominated sorting, which can speed up the processing time of some multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) substantially. The new algorithm is incorporated into the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) and reduces the overall run-time complexity of this algorithm to $O(GN\log ^{M-1}N)$, much faster than the $O(GMN^{2})$ complexity published by Deb et al., (2002). Experiments demonstrate that the improved version of the algorithm is indeed much faster than the previous one. The paper also points out that multiobjective EAs using fitness based on dominance counting and identification of nondominated solutions can be improved significantly in terms of running time by using efficient algorithms known from computer science instead of inefficient $O(MN^{2})$ algorithms. Furthermore, the archives currently used in multiobjective EAs (usually based on lists) are slow and can be improved by using orthogonal range-searching data structures. Finally, the paper discusses the use of niching in multiobjective EAs and points out that the use of efficient algorithms for nearest neighbor identification can be used to speed up multiobjective EAs using certain types of niching. The directions given in this paper can be used to improve the run-time complexities of the algorithms NSGA-II, dynamic multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (DMOEA), strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 (SPEA2), Pareto-frontier differential evolution (PDE), Pareto archive evolutionary strategy (PAES), Pareto envelope-based selection algorithm (PESA), and a multiobjective VLSI-GA.

A Portfolio Approach to Algorithm Selection for Discrete Time-Cost Trade-off Problem

Population-based algorithm portfolios for numerical optimization

Algorithm Portfolio Design: Theory vs. Practice

A portfolio optimization model with three objectives and discrete variables

A Hybridized Vector Optimal Algorithm for Multiobjective Designs of Inverse Problems

Multi-objective-based differential evolution for balancing production cost, diversity and aggregated performance attributes in product family design

Utilizing Dependence among Variables in Evolutionary Algorithms for Mixed-Integer Programming: A Case Study on Multi-Objective Constrained Portfolio Optimization

A Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm for Finding Pareto Optimal Set in Multi-Objective Optimization

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach

Multi-objective approaches to portfolio optimization with market impact costs

Reducing the Run-Time Complexity of Multiobjective EAs: The NSGA-II and Other Algorithms

Population-based Algorithm Portfolios with Automated Constituent Algorithms Selection

Evolutionary Multi-Objective Algorithms for the Knapsack Problems with Stochastic Profits

Evaluating the epsilon-domination based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for a quick computation of Pareto-optimal solutions

PS-AAS: Portfolio Selection for Automated Algorithm Selection in Black-Box Optimization

Comparative analysis of diverse methodologies for portfolio optimization leveraging quantum annealing techniques

EvoFolio: a portfolio optimization method based on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms

Generalization in portfolio-based algorithm selection

An Evolutionary Many-Objective Algorithm Based on a Novel Tournament Selection Strategy

A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II

Sequential vs. Integrated Algorithm Selection and Configuration: A Case Study for the Modular CMA-ES