Abstract:In this paper we provide an overview of important research works on response-adaptive randomization completed in the past decades.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to allocate patients to different treatment groups more effectively in clinical trials. Specifically, the paper focuses on the design of Response - Adaptive Randomization (RAR) and its theoretical properties. Response - Adaptive Randomization is a method of dynamically adjusting the proportion of patient allocation, aiming to increase the probability of patients being allocated to treatment groups with better performance based on the existing treatment - effect data, thereby improving the efficiency and ethical standards of clinical trials.
The paper mainly explores the following points:
1. **Historical Background**: It reviews the development history of Response - Adaptive Randomization, starting from the earliest works of Thompson (1933) and Robbins (1952), to various design methods later, such as the "Play - the - Winner" (PW) rule and the "Randomized Play - the - Winner" (RPW) rule.
2. **Limitations of Existing Methods**: It discusses some limitations of the early methods. For example, the RPW rule may lead to high variability in some cases and is sensitive to initial conditions. These limitations are reflected in the ECMO trial, which failed to provide effective survival rate information due to the small sample size and the不良 characteristics of the RPW rule.
3. **New Design Methods**: It introduces a variety of improved Response - Adaptive Randomization designs proposed in recent years, such as the "Drop - the - Loser" (DL) rule, the "Sequential Estimated - Adjusted Urn" (SEU) model, the "Generalized Drop - the - Loser" (GDL) rule, and the "Immigrated Urn" (IMU) model. These new methods aim to overcome the deficiencies of traditional methods, improve statistical power, and reduce the expected treatment failure.
4. **Optimization and Efficiency**: It studies how to maintain or improve the power of traditional balanced randomization designs through optimizing Response - Adaptive Randomization designs while minimizing the expected treatment failure. The paper proposes several optimization methods, such as the "Doubly Adaptive Biased Coin Design" (DBCD) and the "Efficient Response Adaptive Randomization Designs" (ERAD).
5. **Selection Bias and Lack of Randomness**: It discusses the problems of selection bias and lack of randomness in Response - Adaptive Randomization designs and defines measurement methods for evaluating these problems.
6. **Survival and Delayed Response**: It briefly discusses the influence of survival analysis and delayed response in Response - Adaptive Randomization designs and gives a theorem indicating that a slight delay will not affect the theoretical results of Response - Adaptive Randomization designs.
In conclusion, this paper aims to comprehensively overview the latest progress of Response - Adaptive Randomization designs, provide theoretical basis and practical application guidance, so as to promote its wider use in clinical trials.