A. D. Medus,C. O. Dorso
Abstract:Vaccination is widely recognized as the most effective way of immunization against many infectious diseases. However, unfounded claims about supposed side effects of some vaccines have contributed to spread concern and fear among people, thus inducing vaccination refusal. For instance, MMR vaccine coverage has undergone an important decrease in a large part of Europe and US as a consequence of erroneously alleged side effects, leading to recent measles outbreaks. In this work, we propose a general agent-based model to study the spread of vaccination behavior in social networks, not as an isolated binary opinion spreading on it, but as part of a process of cultural dissemination in the spirit of Axelrod's model. We particularly focused on the impact of a small anti-vaccination movement over an initial population of pro-vaccination social agents. Additionally, we have considered two classes of edges in the underlying social network: personal edges able to spread both opinions and diseases; and the non-personal ones representing interactions mediated by information technologies, which only allow opinion exchanges. We study the clustering of unvaccinated agents as a dynamical outcome of the model, together with its direct relation with the increase of the probability of occurrence and the final size of measles outbreaks. Finally, we illustrate the mitigating effect of a public health campaign, represented by an external field, against the harmful action of anti-vaccination movements. We show that the topological characteristics of the clusters of unvaccinated agents determine the scopes of this mitigating effect.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: How to understand the impact of small - scale anti - vaccine movements on large - scale vaccination behavior through modeling, especially in the presence of external interventions (such as public health campaigns), how this impact changes the spread of vaccination behavior in social networks. Specifically, the author focuses on how a small number of staunch anti - vaccine individuals in a social network where most people initially support vaccination can lead to a decline in the vaccination rate and form unvaccinated groups, and these groups may increase the risk of disease outbreaks. In addition, the study also explores how public health campaigns, as an external intervention method, can alleviate the negative impacts brought by anti - vaccine movements, and how this intervention effect is affected by the topology of unvaccinated groups.
### Background and Problems of the Paper
1. **Importance of Vaccination**: Vaccination is widely regarded as one of the most effective methods for preventing infectious diseases. However, unfounded claims about the side effects of certain vaccines have led to public concerns and fears about vaccination, thus triggering the phenomenon of vaccination refusal.
2. **Example of MMR Vaccine**: For example, the coverage rate of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccines has dropped significantly in parts of Europe and the United States, leading to measles outbreaks in recent years.
3. **Opinion Spread in Social Networks**: In areas where vaccination is voluntary, whether to vaccinate children is a family decision, which is influenced by cultural and social belief systems. People's opinions are spread not only through personal interactions but also through long - distance social networks provided by modern information technology.
4. **Limitations of Existing Models**: Existing models usually assume that opinions are evenly mixed and spread in the network, ignoring the heterogeneity of social connections. In addition, most models do not consider the role of public health campaigns.
### Research Methods
1. **Social Network Model**: The author constructs an agent - based model (ABM), in which the social network consists of nodes (representing families or individuals) and edges (representing social connections). Edges are divided into two categories: direct personal edges (which can spread opinions and diseases) and impersonal edges (which can only spread opinions).
2. **Opinion Spread Model**: A variant of Axelrod's cultural spread model is adopted to simulate the spread of vaccination opinions in social networks. Each agent has a state vector representing its stance on multiple characteristics, among which the vaccination opinion is a binary characteristic (vaccinated or unvaccinated).
3. **Impact of Anti - Vaccine Movements**: A small number of staunch anti - vaccine agents are selected. Their opinions are fixed but can influence their neighbors. These agents are randomly distributed in the initial network.
4. **External Intervention**: An external field (public health campaign) is introduced as a bias term to reduce the probability of vaccinated people turning into unvaccinated ones.
5. **Adaptive Network**: In addition to the static network model, an adaptive network model is also proposed, in which agents can reconnect edges according to the principle of homogeneity.
### Main Results
1. **Clustering of Unvaccinated Groups**: The model shows that unvaccinated agents tend to form clusters, which increases the risk of disease outbreaks.
2. **Effect of External Intervention**: Public health campaigns can significantly reduce the formation of unvaccinated groups and reduce the probability and scale of disease outbreaks.
3. **Impact of Network Topology**: The topology of unvaccinated groups (such as average degree, path length, clustering coefficient and modularity) has an important impact on disease spread. In particular, clusters in the adaptive network model are more contagious than those in the static network model.
### Conclusion
This study shows through modeling how anti - vaccine movements can lead to a decline in the vaccination rate in social networks and form unvaccinated clusters, which increase the risk of disease outbreaks. At the same time, the study also indicates that public health campaigns, as an external intervention method, can effectively alleviate the negative impacts of anti - vaccine movements. The topology of the network plays a crucial role in this process, especially for clusters in the adaptive network model.