Abstract:One of the pivotal quality of service (QoS) metrics in the realm of the Internet of Things (IoT) is Ultra Reliability and Low Latency Communication (URLLC). This paper categorizes URLLC methodologies into four distinct classifications: structure‐based, diversity‐based, metaheuristic algorithm‐based, and channel state information. The present study delineates the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. A new technology known as the Internet of Things (IoT) uses several sensor devices and communication protocols. By implementing cutting‐edge and modern equipment, people use IoT to make their lives easier. Home automation is one of them, and it works with actuators and sensors. However, increasing the number of devices in the IoT network could degrade the Quality of Service (QoS). Therefore, an appropriate framework in software and hardware can improve the Quality of Experience (QoE) and QoS for all users. One of the critical QoS measures in IoT is called Ultra Reliability and Low Latency Communication (URLLC). URLLC is essential in the IoT network released from the third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) cellular. However, a systematic and comprehensive investigation of the practical procedures for URLLC in IoT needs to be done. This paper comprehensively investigates the existing methodologies in this subject. All the chosen techniques are separated into four categories to obtain a complete picture of the topic: structure‐based, diversity‐based, metaheuristic algorithm‐based, and channel state information. In this paper, we also investigate more benefits and drawbacks of other QoS when URLLC is applied in the IoT network. This paper highlights the challenges of URLLC in IoT networks and describes future open issues in detail to provide an efficient way for researchers in this field.

Ultra-Reliable Communication in 5G Wireless Systems

Resource Management for Millimeter-Wave Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications

5G Control Channel Design for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications

Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Wireless Communication: Tail, Risk and Scale

Key Physical Techniques for Implementing URLLC.

5G Ultra-Reliable Vehicular Communication

Urllc3:Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communication,computing,and Control for 6G Networks

On the Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications in Flexible TDD/FDD 5G Networks

Towards Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications: Typical Scenarios, Possible Solutions, and Open Issues

5G Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication Implementation Challenges and Operational Issues with IoT Devices

Ultra-reliable and Low-Latency Communications:Applications, Opportunities and Challenges

Predictive Ultra-Reliable Communication: A Survival Analysis Perspective

Enhanced Non-preemptive Support of URLLC Using Spread Spectrum Underlay Signalling

A Survey on Security of Ultra/Hyper Reliable Low Latency Communication: Recent Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions

Resource Allocation and HARQ Optimization for URLLC Traffic in 5G Wireless Networks

Ultra-Reliable Device-Centric Uplink Communications in Airborne Networks: A Spatiotemporal Analysis

Beyond 5G URLLC evolution: New service modes and practical considerations

UAV-Enabled Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications for 6G: A Comprehensive Survey

Resource allocation for a multi‐device URLLC network

Ultra‐reliability and low‐latency communications on the internet of things based on 5G network: Literature review, classification, and future research view

Capacity Cost of Fulfilling the URLLC Performance in Industrial 5G New Radio Deployments