Synaptic plasticity as Bayesian inference

Laurence Aitchison,Jannes Jegminat,Jorge Aurelio Menendez,Jean-Pascal Pfister,Alex Pouget,Peter E. Latham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1410.1029
2021-03-19
Abstract:Learning, especially rapid learning, is critical for survival. However, learning is hard: a large number of synaptic weights must be set based on noisy, often ambiguous, sensory information. In such a high-noise regime, keeping track of probability distributions over weights is the optimal strategy. Here we hypothesize that synapses take that strategy; in essence, when they estimate weights, they include error bars. They then use that uncertainty to adjust their learning rates, with more uncertain weights having higher learning rates. We also make a second, independent, hypothesis: synapses communicate their uncertainty by linking it to variability in PSP size, with more uncertainty leading to more variability. These two hypotheses cast synaptic plasticity as a problem of Bayesian inference, and thus provide a normative view of learning. They generalize known learning rules, offer an explanation for the large variability in the size of post-synaptic potentials, and make falsifiable experimental predictions.
Neurons and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in a high - noise environment, how to optimize the learning efficiency and accuracy of neural synapses. Specifically, the paper explores how synapses adjust their learning rates by considering the uncertainty in weight estimation, thereby achieving more effective learning. The paper proposes two main hypotheses: 1. **Bayesian Plasticity**: Synapses not only estimate their weights, but also estimate the uncertainty of these weights, and use this uncertainty to dynamically adjust the learning rate. When the uncertainty is high, the learning rate will increase; when the uncertainty is low, the learning rate will decrease. This enables synapses to learn more quickly, especially when the target weights change over time. 2. **Synaptic Sampling**: Synapses convey their uncertainty by relating it to the variability of the postsynaptic potential (PSP). That is, the higher the uncertainty of the synapse, the greater the variability of the PSP. This hypothesis allows synapses to transmit their uncertainty to the surrounding neural network, which is crucial for the brain to monitor the accuracy of its own calculations. These two hypotheses together regard synaptic plasticity as a Bayesian inference problem, providing a normative learning perspective. The paper also verifies the validity of these hypotheses through experimental data and simulation results, and proposes experimental methods that can further test these hypotheses.