Abstract:In this paper, we recalibrate the Cepheid distance to some nearby galaxies observed by the HST Key Project and the Sandage-Tammann-Saha group. We use much of the Key Project methodology in our analysis but apply new techniques, based on Fourier methods to estimate the mean of a sparsely sampled Cepheid light curve, to published extra-galactic Cepheid data. We also apply different calibrating PL relations to estimate Cepheid distances, and investigate the sensitivity of the distance moduli to the adopted calibrating PL relation. We re-determine the OGLE LMC PL relations using a more conservative approach and also study the effect of using Galactic PL relations on the distance scale.For the Key Project galaxies after accounting for charge transfer effects, we find good agreement with an average discrepancy of –0.002 and 0.075 mag when using the LMC and Galaxy, respectively, as a calibrating PL relation. For NGC 4258 which has a geometric distance of , we find a distance modulus of , after correcting for metallicity. In addition we have calculated the Cepheid distance to 8 galaxies observed by the Sandage-Tammann-Saha group and find shorter distance moduli by (mainly due to the use of different LMC PL relations) and on average again when using the LMC and Galaxy, respectively, as a calibrating PL relation. However care must be taken to extrapolate these changed distances to changes in the resulting values of the Hubble constant because STS also use distances to NGC 3368 and 4414 and because STS calibration of SN Ia is often decoupled from the distance to the host galaxy through their use of differential extinction arguments. We also calculate the distance to all these galaxies using PL relations at maximum light and find very good agreement with mean light PL distances.However, after correcting for metallicity effects, the difference between the distance moduli obtained using the two sets of calibrating PL relations becomes negligible. This suggests that Cepheids in the LMC and Galaxy do follow different PL relations and constrains the sign for the coefficient of the metallicity correction, γ, to be negative, at least at the median period , of the target galaxies.

On the distances of planetary nebulae

A new statistical distance scale for planetary nebulae, based on Gaia EDR3

New catalog of distances to planetary nebulae based on Gaia parallaxes and statistical distances

Tests of the Galactic planetary nebula distance scale with the initial Gaia parallax distances of their central stars

New distances to RAVE stars

Astronomical distance scales in the Gaia era

Toward Precision Cosmology with Improved Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function Distances Using VLT-MUSE. II. A Test Sample from Archival Data

New Distance Measurements to the $α$ Persei and Pleiades Clusters

The extra-galactic Cepheid distance scale from LMC and Galactic period-luminosity relations

One star, two star, red star, blue star: an updated planetary nebula central star distance catalogue from Gaia EDR3

Tracing the Galactic Disk with Planetary Nebulae using Gaia DR3

Cepheid Distances to SNe Ia Host Galaxies Based on a Revised Photometric Zero Point of the HST WFPC2 and New PL Relations and Metallicity Corrections

Towards Precision Cosmology With Improved PNLF Distances Using VLT-MUSE II. A Test Sample from Archival Data

Kinematic Distances: A Monte Carlo Method

The Brightest Stars in Galaxies Are Not Good Distance Indicators -

A Test of the Calibration of the Tully-Fisher Relation Using Cepheid and SNIa Distances

"SNe Ia twins for life" towards a precise determination of H$_{0}$

DISTANCE SCALE ZERO POINTS FROM GALACTIC RR LYRAE STAR PARALLAXES

Parallax and masses of alpha Centauri revisited

A revised Cepheid distance to NGC 4258 and a test of the distance scale

Resolved Near-infrared Stellar Photometry from the Magellan Telescope for 13 Nearby Galaxies: J-region Asymptotic Giant Branch Method Distances