Abstract:Transcription factors (TFs) regulate the process of transcription through the modulation of different kinetic steps. Although models can often describe the observed transcriptional output of a measured gene, predicting a TFs role on a given promoter requires an understanding of how the TF alters each step of the transcription process. In this work, we use a simple model of transcription to assess the role of promoter identity, and the degree to which TFs alter binding of RNAP (stabilization) and initiation of transcription (acceleration) on three primary characteristics: the range of steady-state regulation, cell-to-cell variability in expression, and the dynamic response time of a regulated gene. We find that steady state regulation and the response time of a gene behave uniquely for TFs that regulate incoherently, i.e that speed up one step but slow the other. We also find that incoherent TFs have dynamic implications, with one type of incoherent mode configuring the promoter to respond more slowly at intermediate TF concentrations. We also demonstrate that the noise of gene expression for these TFs is sensitive to promoter strength, with a distinct non-monotonic profile that is apparent under stronger promoters. Taken together, our work uncovers the coupling between promoters and TF regulatory modes with implications for understanding natural promoters and engineering synthetic gene circuits with desired expression properties. In this study, we explored the regulatory roles of TFs in gene expression by developing a model that considers the effects of two parameters: stabilization (interactions that modify binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter) and acceleration (interactions that modify the rate of transcription initiation). By applying this model, we evaluated how these factors influence gene expression dynamics, noise, and response times. We show that different combinations of stabilization and acceleration can lead to a rich diversity of regulatory properties. The findings offer valuable insights into the complex interactions between TFs and promoters, underscores the need to characterize TFs in terms of their regulatory modes, and potential guides the engineering of synthetic circuits with desired expression characteristics.

Facilitated diffusion buffers noise in gene expression

Enhancement of gene expression noise due to nonspecific transcription factor binding

The effects of transcription factor competition on gene regulation

Short Residence Times of DNA-Bound Transcription Factors Can Reduce Gene Expression Noise and Increase the Transmission of Information in a Gene Regulation System

Enhancement of gene expression noise from transcription factor binding to genomic decoy sites

Effect of transcription factor resource sharing on gene expression noise

Reduction in gene expression noise by targeted increase in accessibility at gene loci

Buffering gene expression noise by microRNA based feedforward regulation

Energetic funnel facilitates facilitated diffusion

The lower bound on the precision of transcriptional regulation

Facilitated Diffusion of Transcription Factor Proteins with Anomalous Bulk Diffusion

The Role of RNA Condensation in Reducing Gene Expression Noise

Nonspecific transcription factor binding reduces variability in transcription factor and target protein expression

Post-transcriptional Regulation Tends to Attenuate the Mrna Noise and to Increase the Mrna Gain

Control of noise in gene expression by transcriptional reinitiation

Noise-filtering features of transcription regulation in the yeast S. cerevisiae

Buffering and Amplifying Transcriptional Noise During Cell Fate Specification

Coarse-grained modeling of protein unspecifically bound to DNA

Facilitated diffusion framework for transcription factor search with conformational changes

Facilitated diffusion of DNA-binding proteins

Regulatory properties of transcription factors with diverse mechanistic function