Financial Leverage,Leverage Volatility and Economic Growth
Yong Ma,Yulu Chen
2017-01-01
Abstract:Distinct from the traditional view,which argues that a developed financial system would be beneficial for risk diversification and would promote economic growth,post-crisis studies have shifted their focus to the potential nonlinear relationship between finance and real economy as well as their complicated endogenous transmission mechanisms. In particular,as high leverage before a crisis and a rapid deleveraging process after a crisis usually lead to a cyclical"boombust" phenomenon,the relationship between financial leverage and economic growth has become an important topic in the study of post-crisis macroeconomics. In the post-crisis research,although economists have extensively discussed the relationship between financial leverage and economic growth,many questions remain unanswered. First,regarding the question about whether financial leverage and economic growth are significantly correlated with each other and what types of relationship (linear or nonlinear) are involved in this correlation,the current studies are generally set in the early stages and have not yet reached a consensus. In addition,until now,most of the current studies have considered only the impact of level changes in financial leverage on the real economy,while the potential impact of financial leverage volatility on the real economy has been largely ignored. From a theoretical perspective,the smooth functioning of the macro economy depends on a stable and proper ratio of investment to finance,where excessive volatility of financial leverage undoubtedly undermines the stability of the investment-to-finance ratio and thus has negative effects on economic growth. Considering the arguments and unresolved issues in the literature,this paper uses panel data on 68 countries over the period of 1981-2012 and investigates the relationships between financial leverage,leverage volatility and economic growth using system generalized methods of moments estimation. The empirical results show that there is a robust inverted Ushaped relationship between financial leverage and economic growth,suggesting there is a"turning point"after which the positive relationship between financial leverage and economic growth becomes negative. In addition,the empirical results show that the volatility of financial leverage has a significantly negative impact on economic growth,implying that an increase in financial leverage volatility leads to lower economic growth. The preceding two basic conclusions are found to be valid across various robustness checks. As for the location of the turning point for financial leverage,we find it is roughly located at around 1. 486 for private sector credit /gross domestic product (GDP) and 2. 269 for M2 /GDP. According to the empirical results of the paper,based on the average growth rate of private sector credit /GDP and M2 / GDP in the most recent 10 years,China is anticipated to enter the turning point region around 2019-2020. After that,the Chinese economy may enter a"post-turning point"period and face the two basic problems of maintaining economic growth and reducing the financial leverage ratio. According to international experience,in the"post-turning point"period,China's economic growth rate may fall to 4-6％. However,as long as there is no major financial or economic crisis,China's total GDP is likely to reach its largest point during the period of 2028-2041. This means that in the near future the first principle of China's economic and financial development strategy should be "seeking high growth while maintaining stability"to avoid the hard landing of the economy due to economic and financial crises. In this context,from the empirical conclusions of the paper,we propose two policy suggestions. First,considering that China may soon enter the turning point region of financial leverage,after which the economy would face the pressure of slowing down,policy reactions should aim at seeking new growth areas with structural adjustment and economic transformation. Second,as the volatility of financial leverage itself is also detrimental to economic growth,to avoid drastic shock caused by excessive financial leverage volatility to the macro economy,even in the process of deleveraging,policy should fully consider smoothness of operation in practice to better balance economic growth and financial stability.