Comment on "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes"

E.I.Kats,V.V.Lebedev
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.176301
2014-10-07
Abstract:B. Amorim et al., (<a class="link-external link-http" href="http://B.Amorim" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://R.Roldan" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://E.Cappelluti" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://A.Fasolino" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://F.Guinea" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://M.I.Katsnelson" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>, Phys. Rev. B, v. 89, 224307 (2014)) reported the theoretical investigation of quantum crystalline membranes. In this comment we dismiss validity of their calculations based on a "natural" estimation of the ultra-violet (UV) divergent contributions into correlation functions. We claim that such calculations may not be performed correctly within the long-scale theory.
Statistical Mechanics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?