Abstract:We introduce the resource allocation problem where a planner needs to purchase different resources from providers of different qualities and costs, and the planner allocates the resources/providers to consumers with different preferences. The planner has a budget that limits how much he can spend on the resources. He wants to maximize the social welfare generated from the consumers, while keeping his total expenditure for purchasing the resources within his budget. Previous studies have either focused on the resource acquisition part, with one buyer and many strategic sellers, or the resource allocation part, with one seller and many strategic buyers. This is for the first time both providers and consumers are included in the picture. The consumers do not pay for the resources and will act to maximize their individual utilities. Thus the planner must use proper rationing tools to make sure that they will stick to the providers allocated to them. Two widely existing rationing tools are studied in this paper: waiting times and lotteries (and the combination of them). We characterize (sometimes partially) the structures of optimal allocation schemes when different rationing tools are used, and we identify conditions under which lotteries can do better and under which waiting times can do better. We also settle the computation complexity for computing/approximating them. For resource allocation with waiting times, we show that the optimal solution is NP-hard to find, and we construct an FPTAS for it. For resource allocation with lotteries, we show that for a large class of the problem the optimal solution has a surprisingly simple structure, and can be solved by a linear program. Following our results, neither waiting time nor lottery is absolutely better than the other in terms of generating social welfare. A planner should choose an appropriate tool based on the conditions that we identify. Our results then let the planner computes/approximates the corresponding optimal allocations efficiently. Indeed, our results are the first systematic study of both rationing tools when resource acquisition and resource allocation occur together (which is often the case in real life), and we provide useful approaches for future study on this more general and realistic model.

Allocation in Practice

Fair Allocation of goods and chores -- Tutorial and Survey of Recent Results

Bounding the Price-of-Fair-Sharing using Knapsack-Cover Constraints to guide Near-Optimal Cost-Recovery Algorithms

Algorithmic Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items: A Survey and New Questions

Price of Fairness for Allocating a Bounded Resource

On Improving Resource Allocations by Sharing

Fixed Cost Allocation in Two-Stage System: A Data-Driven Approach from the Perspective of Fairness Concern

Fair Healthcare Rationing to Maximize Dynamic Utilities

Fixed Cost Allocation Based on Data Envelopment Analysis from Inequality Aversion Perspectives

A new game theoretical resource allocation algorithm for cloud computing

Fairness over time in dynamic resource allocation with an application in healthcare

Allocating with Priorities and Quotas: Algorithms, Complexity, and Dynamics

Resource Allocation with Budgets : Optimal Stable Allocations and Optimal Lotteries ∗

Fair Division with Allocator's Preference

Artificial Intelligence inspired methods for the allocation of common goods and services

Multiresource Allocation: Fairness-Efficiency Tradeoffs in a Unifying Framework.

Task Allocation in Spatial Crowdsourcing: Current State and Future Directions

Fair Allocation Without Trade

Fair Task Allocation in Crowdsourced Delivery

Symmetric and Asymmetric Allocating Concepts Under Multiple-Goals

Fair Allocation through Selective Information Acquisition