Abstract:Researchers often misinterpret and misrepresent statistical outputs. This abuse has led to a large literature on modification or replacement of testing thresholds and $P$-values with confidence intervals, Bayes factors, and other devices. Because the core problems appear cognitive rather than statistical, we review simple aids to statistical interpretations. These aids emphasize logical and information concepts over probability, and thus may be more robust to common misinterpretations than are traditional descriptions. We use the Shannon transform of the $P$-value $p$, also known as the binary surprisal or $S$-value $s=-\log_{2}(p)$, to measure the information supplied by the testing procedure, and to help calibrate intuitions against simple physical experiments like coin tossing. We also use tables or graphs of test statistics for alternative hypotheses, and interval estimates for different percentile levels, to thwart fallacies arising from arbitrary dichotomies. Finally, we reinterpret $P$-values and interval estimates in unconditional terms, which describe compatibility of data with the entire set of analysis assumptions. We illustrate these methods with a reanalysis of data from an existing record-based cohort study. In line with other recent recommendations, we advise that teaching materials and research reports discuss $P$-values as measures of compatibility rather than significance, compute $P$-values for alternative hypotheses whenever they are computed for null hypotheses, and interpret interval estimates as showing values of high compatibility with data, rather than regions of confidence. Our recommendations emphasize cognitive devices for displaying the compatibility of the observed data with various hypotheses of interest, rather than focusing on single hypothesis tests or interval estimates. We believe these simple reforms are well worth the minor effort they require.

Another Look at Confidence Intervals: Proposal for a More Relevant and Transparent Approach

Semantic and Cognitive Tools to Aid Statistical Science: Replace Confidence and Significance by Compatibility and Surprise

How sure are we? Two approaches to statistical inference

Constructing Confidence Intervals for Selected Parameters

Understanding the implications of low knowledge and high uncertainty in risk studies

The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is Known

Confidence distributions and hypothesis testing

Binomial Confidence Intervals for Rare Events: Importance of Defining Margin of Error Relative to Magnitude of Proportion

Valid and Approximately Valid Confidence Intervals for Current Status Data

A Unified Approach to the Classical Statistical Analysis of Small Signals

Comparing Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion with the Interval Score

Connecting Simple and Precise P-values to Complex and Ambiguous Realities

Confidence distributions for treatment effects in clinical trials: Posteriors without priors

Confidence Intervals for the Probability of Superiority Effect Size Measure and the Area Under a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve

Technical Communique: On the binomial confidence interval and probabilistic robust control

Design and analysis of shortest two-sided confidence intervals for a probability under prior information

Uncertainty Quantification and Confidence Intervals for Naive Rare-Event Estimators

On Improved Confidence Bounds for System Reliability

Assessing Confidence with Assurance 2.0

Possibility-theoretic statistical inference offers performance and probativeness assurances

Beyond Psychology: Prevalence of P Value and Confidence Interval Misinterpretation Across Different Fields