Abstract:Despite some discomfort with this grandly philosophical topic, I do in fact hope to address a venerable pair of philosophical chestnuts: mathematical truth and existence. My plan is to set out three possible stands on these issues, for an exercise in compare and contrast. A word of warning, though, to philosophical purists (and perhaps of comfort to more mathematical readers): I will explore these philosophical positions with an eye to their interconnections with some concrete issues of set theoretic method. Let me begin with a brief look at what to count as ‘philosophy’. To some extent, this is a matter of usage, and mathematicians sometimes classify as ‘philosophical’ any considerations other than outright proofs. So, for example, discussions of the propriety of particular mathematical methods would fall under this heading: should we prefer analytic or synthetic approaches in geometry? Should elliptic functions be treated in terms of explicit representations (as in Weierstrass) or geometrically (as in Riemann)? Should we allow impredicative definitions? Should we restrict ourselves to a logic without bivalence or the law of the excluded middle? Also included in this category would be the trains of thought that shaped our central concepts: should a function always be defined by a formula? Should a group be required to have an inverse for every element? Should ideal divisors be defined contextually or explicitly, treated computationally or abstractly? In addition, there are more general questions concerning mathematical values, aims and goals: Should we strive for powerful theories or low-risk theories? How much stress should be placed on the fact or promise of physical applications? How important are interconnections between the various branches of mathematics? These philosophical questions of method naturally include several peculiar to set theory: should set theorists focus their efforts on drawing consequences for areas of interest to mathematicians outside mathematical logic? Should exploration of the standard axioms of ZFC be preferred to the exploration and exploitation of new axioms? How should axioms for set theory be chosen? What would a solution to the Continuum Problem look like?

Toward a clarity of the extreme value theorem

An elementary approach to extreme values theory

Fun with "Analysis I": basic theorems in calculus revisited

Meaning in Classical Mathematics: Is it at Odds with Intuitionism?

The last proof of extreme value theorem and intermediate value theorem

Extreme value theory for constrained physical systems

Extreme-value Statistics: Rudiments and applications

The infinitesimal behavior of the sum of Cauchy kernels and its derivative at infinity

Applied Philosophy in Mathematics

Mathematical Existence

New extremal principles with applications to stochastic and semi-infinite programming

Tangential Extremal Principles for Finite and Infinite Systems of Sets, I: Basic Theory

The Existential Theory of the Reals as a Complexity Class: A Compendium

On Extremal Functions in Inequalities for Entire Functions

On the spatial extent of extreme threshold exceedances

On the Impact of Approximation Errors on Extreme Quantile Estimation with Applications to Functional Data Analysis

The Many Faces of the Subspace Theorem (after Adamczewski, Bugeaud, Corvaja, Zannier...)

Extreme quantum states and processes, and extreme points of general spectrahedra in finite dimensional algebras

"In Mathematical Language": On Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Foundations

The legacy of Bolzano-Miranda-Poincaré intermediate value theorem

Tension between Intuitive Infinitesimals and Formal Mathematical Analysis