Ian D. Beatty
Abstract:In order to facilitate analyzing video games as learning systems and instructional designs as games, we present a theoretical framework that integrates ideas from a broad range of literature. The framework describes games in terms of four layers, all sharing similar structural elements and dynamics: a micro-level game focused on immediate problem-solving and skill development, a macro-level game focused on the experience of the game world and story and identity development, and two meta-level games focused on building or modifying the game and on social interactions around it. Each layer casts gameplay as a co-construction of the game and the player, and contains three dynamical feedback loops: an exploratory learning loop, an intrinsic motivation loop, and an identity loop.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: how to apply video games as a theoretical framework to instructional design in order to improve school - based teaching methods. Specifically, the author proposes a multi - level theoretical framework, aiming to integrate insights from different fields, including practical suggestions from successful game designers, academic analyses of the learning characteristics and potential of games by learning scientists, and experience reports of innovative teachers on game - based or game - inspired teaching experiments. Through this framework, the author hopes:
1. **Analyze video games as learning systems**: Explore how video games can serve as an effective learning machine to help players grow in problem - solving and skill development.
2. **View instructional design as game design**: Draw on the successful experiences of video game design to re - think and improve classroom instructional design, making it more attractive and effective.
### Main content of the paper
The paper proposes a multi - level framework, describing four levels in games, each of which contains similar structural elements and dynamics:
1. **Micro - level Game**:
- **Problem - solving and skill development**: Focus on immediate problem - solving and skill cultivation. Players conduct exploratory learning through trial - and - error methods and gradually master game skills.
- **Formula representation**: \[ \text{Learning} = f(\text{Trial}, \text{Feedback}, \text{Iteration}) \]
2. **Macro - level Game**:
- **Experience of the game world and identity development**: Focus on the overall experience of the game world, the story line, and the development of the player's identity. At this level, players not only learn specific skills but also develop deeper strategic thinking and values.
- **Formula representation**: \[ \text{Identity development} = g(\text{Story}, \text{Environment}, \text{Interaction}) \]
3. **Builder Meta - game**:
- **Contribution and design ability**: Allow players to use the tools provided by the game to modify or expand the game world. This helps players develop design ability and craftsmanship.
- **Formula representation**: \[ \text{Creativity} = h(\text{Tools}, \text{Projects}, \text{Results}) \]
4. **Social Meta - game**:
- **Social interaction and community participation**: Describe the social interactions of players inside and outside the game, forming social networks and role - playing. Players establish social connections and role identities through these interactions.
- **Formula representation**: \[ \text{Social connection} = i(\text{Interaction}, \text{Role}, \text{Community}) \]
### Dynamic feedback loops
There are three dynamic feedback loops in each level:
- **Exploratory learning loop**: Players gradually master game skills through continuous trial and error.
- **Intrinsic motivation loop**: Players obtain intrinsic satisfaction from challenges and mastery.
- **Identity loop**: Players explore and shape their real identities through the construction and development of virtual identities.
### Comparison and implications
The paper compares the differences between game - based learning and school education, and points out the advantages of games in the following aspects:
- **Player autonomy**: Games allow players to choose the ways to challenge and solve problems, while school education usually prescribes the learning content and methods.
- **Trial - and - error learning**: Games encourage players to learn through multiple trials and failures, while school education often only allows one chance.
- **Identity construction**: Games help players construct new identities, while school education focuses more on the imparting of skills and knowledge.
### Conclusions and future work
The author proposes that this framework can be used to criticize existing instructional designs and generate new teaching strategies. Future work can further link the elements in the framework with the design patterns of successful video games, so as to teach.