Unrelated donor transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus ATG for myelodysplastic neoplasms

Yves Chalandon,Diderik-Jan Eikema,Ivan Sergeevich Moiseev,Fabio Ciceri,Linda Koster,Jan Vydra,Jakob R Passweg,Montserrat Rovira,Tulay Ozcelik,Tobias Gedde-Dahl,Nicolaus Kröger,Victoria Potter,Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha,Alessandro Rambaldi,Maija Itälä-Remes,Alina D Tanase,Francesco Onida,Carmelo Gurnari,Christof Scheid,Joanna Drozd-Sokolowska,Kavita Raj,Donal P McLornan,Marie Robin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013468
IF: 7.642
2024-07-19
Blood Advances
Abstract:Prospective randomized trials have reported a benefit for anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) with unrelated donors (UD). However, the optimal GvHD prophylaxis strategy has been recently challenged by the increasing use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). We report from the EBMT registry the outcomes of 960 patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) undergoing allo-HSCT from UD with PTCY or ATG as GvHD prophylaxis. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Disease characteristics were similar in both groups. Day 28 neutrophil engraftment was significantly better with ATG (93% vs 85%, p<0.001). With a median follow-up of 4.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2 - 4.8), 5-year OS was 58% (95% CI 50-65) with PTCY and 49% (95% CI 46-53%) in the ATG group, p=0.07. 5-year PFS was higher for PTCY with 53% (95% CI 45-60) vs 44% (95% CI 40-48) for ATG, p=0.043. Grade II-IV aGvHD incidence was lower using PTCY (23% [95% CI 17-29%] vs 30% [95% CI 27-33%]), p=0.044 while there was no difference in incidence of cGvHD at 5 years. Multivariable analyses confirmed better OS and PFS with PTCY, with a HR for ATG of 1.32 (1 - 1.74), p=0.05, and a better PFS for PTCY with a HR for ATG of 1.33 (1.03 - 1.73), p=0.03. This study suggests that GvHD prophylaxis using PTCY instead of ATG in this setting remains a valid option. Further prospective randomized studies would be essential to confirm these results.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?