Abstract:The land carbon cycle is fundamental in regulating atmospheric CO2 dynamics from seasonal to centennial scales. The fine equilibrium between photosynthetic gains spent in metabolic costs and/or lost in mortality underpins the contribution of terrestrial ecosystems to the global carbon cycle. Uncertainties and divergent hypotheses on the role of climate in regulating their underlying mechanisms hamper our current diagnostic and prognostic abilities despite growing evidence on ecosystem vulnerability to present and future changes in climate. However, quantitative knowledge of the contributions of different carbon cycle processes regulating carbon uptake and release still need to be improved, inflating the uncertainties in future projections of net land-atmosphere carbon exchanges. In this study, we rely on satellite-based Earth observation retrievals of above-ground biomass and vegetation primary productivity to reconstruct the land-atmosphere carbon exchange dynamics over the last two decades, through the application of a three-box model at the pixel level. Our approach confidently reproduces 60% of the observed variability in atmospheric CO2 growth rate (CGR) over throughout 1997-2019 (R = 0.78, p-val < 0.05), with a low RMSE of 1.0 PgC yr-1. We further detail CO2 release from vegetation dynamics emerging from quick turnover induced by wildfires and leaves senescence, as well as the slow turnover from plant and soil decomposition mechanisms. This allows us to differentiate between transient and lagged effects on land-to-atmosphere fluxes. The carbon release, characterized by a lag of over one year, referred to as lagged effects. Globally, the lagged responses accounted for 50% of the variability in CGR, exceeding three times the contribution of transient fluxes from live vegetation. We have yet to a change or trend in the total contributions of vegetation dynamics to CGR. Yet, the relative role of lagged effects to CGR via decomposition fluxes increased by 50%, possibly due to accelerated mortality and decomposition fluxes. As global warming imposes higher stress on vegetation while increasing temperature-mediated decomposition, our results highlight the importance of quantifying their underlying metabolic responses. Such understanding is instrumental for assessing the contribution of adaptation and mitigation measures that will shape the contribution of the terrestrial carbon cycle to dampen the effects of anthropogenic emissions on global climate.

Transition from positive to negative indirect CO2 effects on the vegetation carbon uptake

Constraints To Vegetation Growth Reduced By Region-Specific Changes In Seasonal Climate

Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Negatively Impacts Photosynthesis Through Radiative Forcing and Physiology‐mediated Climate Feedback

Vegetation Growth Due to CO2 Fertilization is Threatened by Increasing Vapor Pressure Deficit

Sensitivity of Terrestrial Water and Energy Budgets to CO 2 -Physiological Forcing: an Investigation Using an Offline Land Model

Low and Contrasting Impacts of Vegetation CO2 Fertilization on Global Terrestrial Runoff over 1982–2010: Accounting for Aboveground and Belowground Vegetation–co2 Effects

Importance Of Carbon Dioxide Physiological Forcing To Future Climate Change

Increased Global Vegetation Productivity Despite Rising Atmospheric Dryness Over the Last Two Decades

Effect of Climate and Co2 Changes on the Greening of the Northern Hemisphere over the Past Two Decades

Influence of Vegetation Growth on the Enhanced Seasonality of Atmospheric CO2

Inhibitive effects of recent exceeding air temperature optima of vegetation productivity and increasing water limitation on photosynthesis reversed global greening

Characteristics and drivers of vegetation productivity sensitivity to increasing CO2 at Northern Middle and High Latitudes

Mutual inhibition effects of elevated CO2 and climate change on global forest GPP

Direct Vegetation Response to Recent CO2 Rise Shows Limited Effect on Global Streamflow

Ignoring Plant Physiological Responses to Elevated CO2 Will Overestimate Terrestrial Vertebrate Biodiversity Loss Under Global Climate Change

European Carbon Uptake Has Not Benefited from Vegetation Greening

Transient and Lagged Effects of Vegetation Dynamics&#160;on the Global CO2 Growth Rate

Future reversal of warming-enhanced vegetation productivity in the Northern Hemisphere

Increasing Sensitivity of Dryland Vegetation Greenness to Precipitation Due to Rising Atmospheric CO2.

Diminishing carryover benefits of earlier spring vegetation growth

Does vegetation greening have a positive effect on global vegetation carbon and water use efficiency?