Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development

Shauhrat S. Chopra,Sachini Supunsala Senadheera,Pavani Dulanja Dissanayake,Piumi Amasha Withana,Rajeev Chib,Jay Hyuk Rhee,Yong Sik Ok
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020606
IF: 3.9
2024-01-11
Sustainability
Abstract:The ascent of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting has established itself as a global standard in financial markets, reflecting a paradigm shift toward corporate sustainability. Despite this, persistent concerns surround the quality of ESG reporting and its tangible impact on Sustainable Development (SD). To address the imperative transition toward a broader SD agenda within the ESG reporting framework, this study delves into contemporary issues and challenges associated with ESG reporting. It emphasizes the scarcity of interdisciplinary expertise across diversified fields, which is a crucial element for establishing robust reporting mechanisms capable of encompassing the multifaceted nature of sustainability. To address this, ESG reporting should extend beyond its company-centric focus, adapting traditional accounting systems to more effectively incorporate evolving ESG disclosure demands. This adjustment will facilitate a transparent portrayal of environmental and social impacts. The Social and Environmental Accounting (SEA) framework presents a structured approach to facilitate this transformation. This study underscores key SEA aspects that will shape future research, including enhancing data accuracy, standardizing sustainability metrics, evaluating the influence of ESG reporting on stakeholders, and refining disclosure formats.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of the effectiveness of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting in Sustainable Development (SD) and the challenges it faces. Specifically: 1. **Quality and Impact of ESG Reporting**: Although ESG reporting has become a standard in global financial markets, its quality and actual impact on sustainable development remain highly questioned. The paper points out that ESG reports may suffer from inaccurate data, lack of standardized metrics, and insufficient assessment of stakeholder impacts. 2. **Scarcity of Interdisciplinary Expertise**: ESG reporting needs to cover complex issues across multiple fields, but currently, there is a lack of interdisciplinary expertise. This scarcity makes it difficult for existing reporting mechanisms to fully reflect the multifaceted nature of sustainability. 3. **Limitations of a Company-Centric Perspective**: Current ESG reports mainly focus on internal company operations and fail to adequately consider the impacts on the external environment and society. Therefore, the paper suggests expanding traditional accounting systems to better incorporate ESG disclosure requirements and enhance transparency. 4. **Application of the Social and Environmental Accounting (SEA) Framework**: To improve ESG reporting, the paper emphasizes the importance of the SEA framework. The SEA framework can provide structured support for the collection and organization of sustainability information, helping to improve data accuracy, standardize sustainability metrics, and assess the impact of ESG reports on stakeholders. In summary, the paper aims to explore how to promote broader sustainable development goals by improving ESG reporting. Especially in the context of escalating global environmental crises and social inequalities, ESG reporting needs to go beyond mere corporate responsibility and become a powerful tool for driving sustainable development.