Exploring the research needs, barriers and facilitators to the collection of biological data in adolescence for mental health research: a scoping review protocol paper

Worrell,C.,Pollard,R.,Weetman,T.,Sadiq,Z.,Pieptan,M.,Brooks,G.,Broome,M.,Campbell,N.,Gardner,N.,Harding,S.,Lavis,A.,McEachan,R. R. C.,Mondelli,V.,Morgan,C.,Nosarti,C.,Porat,T.,Ryan,D.,Schmid,L.,Shire,K.,Woods,A.,Pariante,C. M.,CELEBRATE Youth Expert Working Group,Dazzan,P.,Upthegrove,R.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081360
IF: 3.006
2024-06-12
BMJ Open
Abstract:Introduction While research into adolescent mental health has developed a considerable understanding of environmental and psychosocial risk factors, equivalent biological evidence is lacking and is not representative of economic, social and ethnic diversity in the adolescent population. It is important to understand the possible barriers and facilitators to conduct this research. This will then allow us to improve our understanding of how biology interacts with environmental and psychosocial risk factors during adolescence. The objective of this scoping review is to identify and understand the needs, barriers and facilitators related to the collection of biological data in adolescent mental health research. Methods and analysis Reviewers will conduct a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, ERIC, EMBASE, ProQuest, EBSCO Global Health electronic databases, relevant publications and reference lists to identify studies published in the English language at any time. This scoping review will identify published studies exploring mental health/psychopathology outcomes, with biological measures, in participants between the ages of 11 and 18 and examine the reported methodology used for data collection. Data will be summarised in tabular form with narrative synthesis and will use the methodology of Levac et al , supplemented by subsequent recommendations from the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review Methodology. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. The scoping review will be conducted with input from patient and public involvement, specifically including young people involved in our study ('Co-producing a framework of guiding principles for Engaging representative and diverse cohorts of young peopLE in Biological ReseArch in menTal hEalth'—www.celebrateproject.co.uk) Youth Expert Working Group. Dissemination will include publication in peer-reviewed journals, academic presentations and on the project website.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the research needs, barriers, and facilitators related to the collection of biological data in adolescent mental health research. Specifically, the goal of the paper is to identify and understand the needs, barriers, and facilitators in collecting biological data in adolescent mental health research. By systematically searching multiple databases (such as PubMed, Medline, Scopus, etc.) as well as relevant publications and references, this review will identify published studies and analyze the methods used for data collection. Additionally, the paper will summarize the data and use the narrative synthesis methods recommended by Levac et al. and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The authors point out that despite a considerable understanding of the environmental and psychosocial risk factors for adolescent mental health, there is a lack of biological evidence representing economic, social, and ethnic diversity. Therefore, understanding how to overcome these barriers is crucial for better understanding how biology interacts with environmental and psychosocial risk factors. Furthermore, the paper highlights some limitations in existing research, such as insufficient sample representativeness, recruitment difficulties, and a lack of data from low- and middle-income countries. Through this review, the researchers hope to provide valuable insights for future mental health research to improve methods for collecting biological data.