Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats

Kristine Janssen,Kangli Deng,Steve J. A. Majerus,Dan Li Lin,Brett Hanzlicek,Robert S. Butler,Carl H. van der Vaart,Margot S. Damaser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93772-x

IF: 4.6

2021-07-13

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Abstract Transurethral and suprapubic catheterization have both been used to test urethral function in rats; however, it is unknown whether these methods affect urethral function or if the order of catheterization affects the results. The aim of this cross-over designed experiment was to compare the effects of catheterization methods and order on leak point pressure (LPP) testing. LPP and simultaneous external urethral sphincter electromyography (EUS EMG) were recorded in anesthetized female virgin Sprague-Dawley rats in a cross-over design to test the effects of transurethral and suprapubic catheterization. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure during LPP testing whether measured with a transurethral or suprapubic catheter. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure between the first and second catheter insertions. However, peak EMG firing rate, as well as peak EMG amplitude and EMG amplitude difference between peak and baseline were significantly higher after the first catheter insertion compared to the second insertion, regardless of the catheter method. Our results suggest that route of catheterization does not alter urethral function, e.g. create a functional partial outlet obstruction. Either catheterization method could be used for LPP and/or EUS EMG testing in rats.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to compare the effects of transurethral and suprapubic catheterization on urethral function testing in rats. Specifically, the researchers conducted a crossover design experiment to evaluate the impact of the two catheterization methods and their sequence on leak point pressure (LPP) testing and simultaneous external urethral sphincter electromyography (EUS EMG) recording results. The main objective of the study was to determine whether the catheterization route affects urethral function, such as causing functional partial outlet obstruction, and whether the sequence of catheterization affects the test results.

The study found that there was no significant difference in the measurement results of peak bladder pressure between transurethral and suprapubic catheterization, and there was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure between the first and second catheterizations. However, the peak EMG discharge rate, peak EMG amplitude, and the difference between peak and baseline EMG amplitude after the first catheterization were significantly higher than after the second catheterization, regardless of the catheterization method used. This suggests that the sequence of catheterization may affect the EUS EMG results but does not affect the basic measurement of urethral function.

In conclusion, the study suggests that the catheterization route does not alter urethral function, so either catheterization method can be used for LPP and/or EUS EMG testing in rats. However, the study also points out that the two catheterization methods should not be mixed within the same experimental procedure, as this may introduce sequence dependency and reduce the accuracy of the tests.