Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the primary clinical outcomes of immediate provisionalization with a monolithic crown utilizing a novel chairside computer aided design and computer aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) workflow for single tooth immediate implant placement. Methods: This pilot study was a prospective within-subjects design. Thirteen consecutive patients were included and diagnosed with untreatable single incisor or premolar with fine general and local anatomical conditions. The trial was conducted at Department of Implantology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, between January 2016 and June 2016. The teeth were extracted atraumatically and implants were immediately placed in the fresh sockets. Two screw-retained interim crowns were fabricated for the same site utilizing different workflows, a monolithic lithium disilicate (LS2) crown produced by CEREC (Sirona, Germany) chairside CAD/CAM system (CER group) and a manually fabricated resin crown utilizing conventional workflow (CONV group) respectively. The patients were blinded to the group allocation of the two interim crowns. After the clinical try-in for both crowns in a randomized sequence, the patients' level of satisfaction was assessed with a virtual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaire. The restorations chosen by patients themselves were seated in the implants by one experienced prosthodontist. The accuracy, aesthetic effect and clinical time consumption of both groups were compared. Statistical analyses were performed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: All patients were treated with atraumatic tooth extraction, immediate implant placement using flapless surgery and immediate provisionalization in a single visit. The interim crowns of both groups could be fitted with or without slight adjustments. For each patient, the interim crown of CER group was chosen to be seated with a relatively higher VAS result. The white esthetic score (WES) results demonstrated no statistically significant difference between CER group (7.5±1.1) and CONV group (7.9±0.9) (P>0.05). The mean total work time was significantly different resulting in (131.9±5.0) min for CER group and (205.2±6.3) min(P<0.05). The major difference lied in the laboratory work time, resulting in (113.5±6.3) min for CER group which was significantly shorter than (185.6±6.6) min for CONV group. As for impression taking time, the CER group (7.5±0.8) min was significantly shorter than CONV group (11.7± 1.1) min (P<0.05). However, analysis for clinical adjustment time showed a significantly longer time for CER group [(11.0±2.1) min vs (8.0±2.8) min, P<0.05]. After 3-6 months of observation, the overall survival rate was 100%. Screw loosening occurred in 4 patients and was tightened again. No other major complication soccurred. Conclusions: The full digital workflow utilizing CEREC chairside CAD/CAM system to fabricate interim crowns after immediate implant placement in one single visit was feasible. It was more time-efficient and could effectively shorten the laboratory work time compared to the conventional workflow. Patients demonstrated high satisfaction and there was no statistical difference in WES results compared to the conventional workflow. Favorable clinical outcomes were gained in this short-term follow-up study.

Effect of immediate all‐digital restoration of single posterior implants: The SafetyCrown concept on patient‐reported outcome measures, accuracy, and treatment time—A randomized clinical trial

Immediate loading on two adjacent single dental implants with definitive nonsplinted restorations: A proof of concept in the posterior zone

Crown adjustment and chairside efficiency of single‐unit restorations fabricated from immediate and staged impressions using a digital workflow for posterior implants

[A Pilot Clinical Study of Immediate Provisionalization with a Chairside Computer Aided Design and Computer Aided Manufacture Monolithic Crown for Single Tooth Immediate Implant Placement].

Time Efficiency and Quality of Outcomes in a Model-Free Digital Workflow Using Digital Impression Immediately after Implant Placement: A Double-Blind Self-Controlled Clinical Trial

Crown Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations in a Complete Digital Workflow: A Randomized Control Trial

Navigating Esthetic Challenges: Immediate Implant Placement and Comprehensive Restorative Solutions-A Clinical Case With 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

A Double-Blind Randomized Within-Subject Study to Evaluate Clinical Applicability of Four Digital Workflows for the Fabrication of Posterior Single Implant Crown

Comparing Single Tooth Implant Placement With and Without Allogenic Soft Tissue Augmentation. A Randomized Clinical Trial

SafetyCrown: a patient-centered, fully digital concept for immediate implant restoration following the one-abutment/one-time concept—a pilot case series of a new treatment concept

Long-Term Peri-Implant Health and Papilla Formation at Healed Sites by Chairside Provisionalization of Single-Tooth Implants: A Prospective Case Series

Immediate Implant Placement of a Single Central Incisor Using a CAD/CAM Crown-Root Form Technique: Provisional to Final Restoration

Complications and Patient-Centered Outcomes of an Implant- Supported Single Crown after Immediate and Delayed Loading: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Single posterior implant-supported restorations fabricated using a scannable healing abutment versus a conventional scan body: A randomized controlled trial

Immediate implant placement with immediate or delayed provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic zone: A 10‐year randomized trial

Immediate versus Delayed Implantation for Single-Tooth Restoration of Maxillary Anterior Teeth: A Comparative Analysis on Efficacy

A randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical fit and chairside adjustment time for implant-supported crowns fabricated by fully digital and partially digital techniques

Time Efficiency of Immediate Loading of Full-arch Implant Reconstructions Using Prefabricated Prostheses Located by an Anchor Pin: a Pilot Study.

Immediate single-tooth implant placement in bony defect sites: A 10-year randomized controlled trial

Success and patient satisfaction of immediately loaded zirconia implants with fixed restorations one year after loading