Evaluation of the Large EURO‐CORDEX Regional Climate Model Ensemble
Robert Vautard,Nikolay Kadygrov,Carley Iles,Fredrik Boberg,Erasmo Buonomo,Katharina Bülow,Erika Coppola,Lola Corre,Erik Meijgaard,Rita Nogherotto,Marit Sandstad,Clemens Schwingshackl,Samuel Somot,Emma Aalbers,Ole B. Christensen,James M. Ciarlo,Marie‐Estelle Demory,Filippo Giorgi,Daniela Jacob,Richard G. Jones,Klaus Keuler,Erik Kjellström,Geert Lenderink,Guillaume Levavasseur,Grigory Nikulin,Jana Sillmann,Cosimo Solidoro,Silje Lund Sørland,Christian Steger,Claas Teichmann,Kirsten Warrach‐Sagi,Volker Wulfmeyer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032344
2021-09-01
Abstract:The use of regional climate model (RCM)‐based projections for providing regional climate information in a research and climate service contexts is currently expanding very fast. This has been possible thanks to a considerable effort in developing comprehensive ensembles of RCM projections, especially for Europe, in the EURO‐CORDEX community (Jacob et al., 2014, 2020). As of end of 2019, EURO‐CORDEX has developed a set of 55 historical and scenario projections (RCP8.5) using 8 driving global climate models (GCMs) and 11 RCMs. This article presents the ensemble including its design. We target the analysis to better characterize the quality of the RCMs by providing an evaluation of these RCM simulations over a number of classical climate variables and extreme and impact‐oriented indices for the period 1981–2010. For the main variables, the model simulations generally agree with observations and reanalyses. However, several systematic biases are found as well, with shared responsibilities among RCMs and GCMs: Simulations are overall too cold, too wet, and too windy compared to available observations or reanalyses. Some simulations show strong systematic biases on temperature, others on precipitation or dynamical variables, but none of the models/simulations can be defined as the best or the worst on all criteria. The article aims at supporting a proper use of these simulations within a climate services context. This study analyses the ability of the unprecedently large ensemble of 55 regional climate simulations to properly simulate the climatology of several variables, extremes, and impact‐oriented indices over the European continent. This analysis should guide the use of regional climate projections in climate services development. Biases of an unprecedentedly large ensemble of 55 European climate simulations using 8 global climate models and 11 regional climate models are assessed Climate variables, extremes, and impact‐oriented indices are assessed, indicating whether such ensemble can—or cannot—be used in climate service applications Simulations are generally too wet, too cold and too windy, and the share of contributions to the bias from GCMs and RCMs is found to differ for each variable or index
meteorology & atmospheric sciences