Abstract:During prophase of the first meiotic division, cells deliberately break their DNA<a href="/articles/s41586-020-2592-2#ref-CR1">1</a>. These DNA breaks are repaired by homologous recombination, which facilitates proper chromosome segregation and enables the reciprocal exchange of DNA segments between homologous chromosomes<a href="/articles/s41586-020-2592-2#ref-CR2">2</a>. A pathway that depends on the MLH1–MLH3 (MutLγ) nuclease has been implicated in the biased processing of meiotic recombination intermediates into crossovers by an unknown mechanism<a href="#ref-CR3">3</a>,<a href="#ref-CR4">4</a>,<a href="#ref-CR5">5</a>,<a href="#ref-CR6">6</a>,<a href="/articles/s41586-020-2592-2#ref-CR7">7</a>. Here we have biochemically reconstituted key elements of this pro-crossover pathway. We show that human MSH4–MSH5 (MutSγ), which supports crossing over<a href="/articles/s41586-020-2592-2#ref-CR8">8</a>, binds branched recombination intermediates and associates with MutLγ, stabilizing the ensemble at joint molecule structures and adjacent double-stranded DNA. MutSγ directly stimulates DNA cleavage by the MutLγ endonuclease. MutLγ activity is further stimulated by EXO1, but only when MutSγ is present. Replication factor C (RFC) and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) are additional components of the nuclease ensemble, thereby triggering crossing-over. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in which MutLγ cannot interact with PCNA present defects in forming crossovers. Finally, the MutLγ–MutSγ–EXO1–RFC–PCNA nuclease ensemble preferentially cleaves DNA with Holliday junctions, but shows no canonical resolvase activity. Instead, it probably processes meiotic recombination intermediates by nicking double-stranded DNA adjacent to the junction points<a href="/articles/s41586-020-2592-2#ref-CR9">9</a>. As DNA nicking by MutLγ depends on its co-factors, the asymmetric distribution of MutSγ and RFC–PCNA on meiotic recombination intermediates may drive biased DNA cleavage. This mode of MutLγ nuclease activation might explain crossover-specific processing of Holliday junctions or their precursors in meiotic chromosomes<a href="/articles/s41586-020-2592-2#ref-CR4">4</a>.

The molecular machinery of meiotic recombination

Meiotic Recombination. The Metabolic Pathways from DNA Double-Strand Breaks to Crossing Over and Chiasmata

New Insights into the Role of DNA Synthesis in Meiotic Recombination

Double-stranded DNA Breaks and Gene Functions in Recombination and Meiosis

Homologous recombinational repair proteins in mouse meiosis

Understanding the genetic basis of variation in meiotic recombination: past, present, and future

Identification of factors influencing strand bias in oligonucleotide-mediated recombination in Escherichia coli.

Temporal and Functional Relationship between Synaptonemal Complex Morphogenesis and Recombination during Meiosis

Seeding the meiotic DNA break machinery and initiating recombination on chromosome axes

The Configuration of RPA, RAD51, and DMC1 Binding in Meiosis Reveals the Nature of Critical Recombination Intermediates

Meiotic Recombination: Mixing It Up in Plants.

Homologous recombination and the repair of DNA double-strand breaks

Double-strand Break Repair on Sex Chromosomes: Challenges During Male Meiotic Prophase.

Defining the Influence of Rad51 and Dmc1 Lineage-Specific Amino Acids on Genetic Recombination

The meiotic-specific Mek1 kinase in budding yeast regulates interhomolog recombination and coordinates meiotic progression with double-strand break repair

Recent advances in functional conservation and divergence of recombinase RAD51 and DMC1.

The Involvement of Replication in Single Stranded Oligonucleotide-Mediated Gene Repair

Characterization of meiotic recombination intermediates through gene knockouts in founder hybrid mice

Regulation of the MLH1–MLH3 endonuclease in meiosis

Cytological Studies of Human Meiosis: Sex-Specific Differences in Recombination Originate at, or Prior to, Establishment of Double-Strand Breaks

In my end is my beginning: control of end resection and DSBR pathway ‘choice’ by cyclin-dependent kinases