A study of three-prong tau decays with charged kaons

The OPAL Collaboration,G. Abbiendi et al.,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100520000272
IF: 4.991
2000-03-01
The European Physical Journal C
Abstract:Abstract. From an analysis of the ionisation energy loss of charged particles selected from a sample of 147926 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}${\rm e}^+{\rm e}^- \!\!\rightarrow\! \tau^+\tau^-$\end{document} candidates recorded in the OPAL detector at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}${\rm e}^+{\rm e}^-$\end{document} centre-of-mass energies near the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}${\rm Z}^0$\end{document} resonance, we determine the branching ratios: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document} \begin{eqnarray*} {\rm Br}(\tau^-\rightarrow \,\nu_\tau\,{\rm K}^-\pi^-\pi^+ (\pi^0)) & = & 0.343\pm0.073\pm0.031 \;\% \nonumber \\[1mm] {\rm Br}(\tau^-\rightarrow \,\nu_\tau\,{\rm K}^-\pi^-{\rm K}^+ (\pi^0)) & = & 0.159\pm0.053\pm0.020 \;\% , \nonumber \end{eqnarray*} \end{document} where the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$(\pi^0)$\end{document} notation refers to decay modes with or without an accompanying \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$\pi^0$\end{document}. The \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document} \[\tau^- \rightarrow \nu_\tau{\rm K}^-\pi^- \pi^+ (\pi^0)\] \end{document} final states occurring through \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$\tau^- \rightarrow \nu_\tau{\rm K}^-{\rm K}^0_{\rm S} (\pi^0)$\end{document} are treated as background in this analysis. We also examine the resonant structure of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$\tau^- \!\!\rightarrow\!\! \,\nu_\tau\,{\rm K}^-\pi^-\pi^+$\end{document} candidates. Under the assumption that the resonant structure is dominated by the K\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$_1$\end{document} resonances, we determine: \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document} \begin{eqnarray*} R & = & {{{\rm Br}(\tau^-\rightarrow \,\nu_\tau\,{\rm K}_1(1270))}\over { {\rm Br}(\tau^-\rightarrow \,\nu_\tau\,{\rm K}_1(1400)) + {\rm Br}(\tau^-\rightarrow \,\nu_\tau\,{\rm K}_1(1270))} } = 0.71 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.11 . \nonumber \end{eqnarray*} \end{document} In all results, the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic.
physics, particles & fields
What problem does this paper attempt to address?