Abstract:Recent studies have pursued the nature of inhibition observed in retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) tasks. In a RIF paradigm, participants are trained on category-exemplar pairs in Phase 1. Then, some exemplars from select categories (Rp+ items) receive further practice in Phase 2. At test, impaired recall for non-practiced exemplars of the practiced categories (Rp- items) is observed relative to exemplars from non-practiced categories (Nrp items). This difference constitutes RIF. Prior reports of spontaneous recovery from RIF indicate that RIF represents a lapse rather than a loss of memory. Empirical analogs and theoretical considerations suggest that RIF should also be reversible through a change of context between Phase 2 and testing (i.e., renewal). We conducted two experiments using human participants to evaluate the context dependency of RIF. In both experiments, Phases 1 and 2 occurred in distinctly different contexts with subsequent testing occurring in either the Phase 1 context or the Phase 2 context. RIF was observed in both experiments. Experiment 1 additionally found that the magnitude of RIF was not reduced by testing in the Phase 1 context relative to testing in the Phase 2 context. Experiment 2 further tested context dependency of RIF by (1) increasing the dissimilarity between the two contexts and (2) inserting a retention interval between Phase 2 and test for half of the participants in each test context condition. The data again indicated no effect of the context manipulation. Thus, no renewal from RIF was observed in either experiment; moreover, these null findings were supported by Bayesian analyses. These results are compared with analogous inhibitory processes in the animal memory literature that typically show both physical and temporal context dependency.

Retroactive inhibition in free-recall learning of categorized lists

Retroactive inhibition as a function of the locus of categorized response sets

Short-term Temporal Changes in Free Recall

Selective retrieval in categorized lists: Detrimental, neutral, and beneficial effects on nonretrieved items.

Recall of categorized and unrelated lists with complete versus discrete presentation and fast versus moderate presentation rates

Recall of semantic domains

Dissociating early- and late-selection processes in recall: The mixed blessing of categorized study lists

Effects of semantic list structure differences in free recall

Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall

EFFECTS OF LIST-ITEM CUES UPON FREE RECALL OF CATEGORIZED WORD LISTS

Developmental changes in free recall and serial learning of categorically structured lists

Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism

Failure to observe renewal following retrieval-induced forgetting

Prediction of Organization in Free Recall from Reported Learning Strategy

Putting retrieval-induced forgetting in context: An inhibition-free, context-based account.

A Remember/Know Examination of Free-recall Reveals Dissociative Roles of Item- and Context-Information over Time

Does retrieving a memory insulate it against memory inhibition? A retroactive interference study

Forgetting and remembering in free recall: Intentional and unintentional.

The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting

The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes

Retrieval-induced forgetting of spatial position depends on access to multiple shared features within categories