Abstract:Supported by the controlling of oxidation‐reduction conditions, the homogeneous LFP‐cathodes can be prepared, displaying uniform particle size and rapid Li‐ions diffusion behaviors. Especially, through Kg‐scale experiments, the pouch full‐cell (LFP‐500 vs recovered graphite) displays ≈4200 mAh capacity, with attractive cycling stability (retention of 96.83%, after 500 loops). Captured by the remarkable environmental/economic value, recycling spent LiFePO4 has attracted numerous attention. However, restricted by diverse failure mechanisms and different particle‐sizes/active‐sites, recycling strategies still suffer from uneven repairing results and poor accessibility. For promoting their application in commercial systems, the uniform physical‐chemical properties are urgent for regenerated samples. Herein, by tailoring oxidation‐reduction manners, the homogeneous cathode materials can be prepared, displaying uniform particle size and restored lattice. The capacity of as‐optimized samples can be kept ≈141.5 mAh g−1 at 1.0 C, and 137 mAh g−1 with a retention of 92% after 300 cycles at 2.0 C. After Kg‐scale experiments, the pouch full‐cell (LFP‐500 vs recovered graphite) delivers ≈4200 mAh capacity, with considerable cycling stability (retention 96.83%, after 500 loops). Importantly, the detailed mechanism of oxidation/reduction‐conditions is investigated, especially their lattice reconstitution and ions‐ diffusion behaviors. Supported by kinetic analysis and DFT calculations, the fascinating stability of LFP‐500 is further proved, mainly derived from the accelerated Li‐diffusion behaviors. Compared to traditional recovering manners, oxidation/reduction process displays low cost, energy‐consumption, and pollution, accompanied with considerable large‐scale application potential. Given this, this work is anticipated to illustrate the in‐depth mechanism of lattice‐reconstruction, while offering significant strategies for large‐scale and homogenized regeneration.

High Electrochemical Performance Recycling Spent LiFePO 4 Materials through the Preoxidation Regeneration Strategy

Direct regeneration of fluorine-doped carbon-coated LiFePO4 cathode material from spent lithium-ion battery

A Room‐Temperature Lithium‐Restocking Strategy for the Direct Reuse of Degraded LiFePO4 Electrodes

Direct Recycling Strategy for Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Powder: an Efficient and Wastewater-Free Process

Long‐Life Regenerated LiFePO4 from Spent Cathode by Elevating the d‐Band Center of Fe

Simultaneous anodic de-lithiation/cathodic lithium-embedded regeneration method for recycling of spent LiFePO 4 battery

Direct regeneration of spent LiFePO 4 materials via a green and economical one-step hydrothermal process

Closed-loop regeneration of LiFePO4 from spent lithium-ion batteries: A “feed three birds with one scone” strategy toward advanced cathode materials

Direct regeneration of LiFePO4 cathode by inherent impurities in spent lithium-ion batteries

Room-temperature Direct Regeneration of Spent LiFePO4 Cathode Using the External Short Circuit Strategy

High performance of regenerated LiFePO4 from spent cathodes via an in situ coating and heteroatom-doping strategy using amino acids

A Multifunctional Amino Acid Enables Direct Recycling of Spent LiFePO4 Cathode Material

Direct regeneration of waste LiFePO4 cathode materials with a solid-phase method promoted by activated CNTs

Large‐Scale and Homogenized Strategies of Spent LiFePO4 Recycling: Reconstruction of Targeted Lattice

Direct Regeneration of Degraded LiFePO4 Cathode via Reductive Solution Relithiation Regeneration Process

Direct Regeneration of High-Value LiFePO 4 Cathode Materials with Nitrogen Doped Carbon Coating

Environmental-friendly low-cost direct regeneration of cathode material from spent LiFePO 4

Regenerated LiFePO4/C for scrapped lithium iron phosphate powder batteries by pre-oxidation and reduction method

Challenges and perspectives towards direct regeneration of spent LiFePO 4 cathode

Advances and perspectives towards spent LiFePO4 battery recycling

Toward Sustainable Lithium Iron Phosphate in Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Regeneration Strategies and Their Challenges