Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski,Anthony Yeung,Morgan P Lorio,Huilin Yang,Jorge Felipe Ramírez León,José Antonio Soriano Sánchez,Rossano Kepler Alvim Fiorelli,Kang Taek Lim,Jaime Moyano,Álvaro Dowling,Juan Marcelo Sea Aramayo,Jeong-Yoon Park,Hyeun-Sung Kim,Jiancheng Zeng,Bin Meng,Fernando Alvarado Gómez,Carolina Ramirez,Paulo Sérgio Teixeira De Carvalho,Manuel Rodriguez Garcia,Alfonso Garcia,Eulalio Elizalde Martínez,Iliana Margarita Gómez Silva,José Edgardo Valerio Pascua,Luis Miguel Duchén Rodríguez,Robert Meves,Cristiano M Menezes,Luis Eduardo Carelli,Alexandre Fogaça Cristante,Rodrigo Amaral,Geraldo de Sa Carneiro,Helton Defino,Vicky Yamamoto,Babak Kateb,On Behalf Of Teams/Organizations/Institutions

Abstract:Pain generator-based lumbar spinal decompression surgery is the backbone of modern spine care. In contrast to traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for spinal surgery, assessing the severity of neural element encroachment, instability, and deformity, staged management of common painful degenerative lumbar spine conditions is likely to be more durable and cost-effective. Targeting validated pain generators can be accomplished with simplified decompression procedures associated with lower perioperative complications and long-term revision rates. In this perspective article, the authors summarize the current concepts of successful management of spinal stenosis patients with modern transforaminal endoscopic and translaminar minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques. They represent the consensus statements of 14 international surgeon societies, who have worked in collaborative teams in an open peer-review model based on a systematic review of the existing literature and grading the strength of its clinical evidence. The authors found that personalized clinical care protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis rooted in validated pain generators can successfully treat most patients with sciatica-type back and leg pain including those who fail to meet traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for surgery since nearly half of the surgically treated pain generators are not shown on the preoperative MRI scan. Common pain generators in the lumbar spine include (a) an inflamed disc, (b) an inflamed nerve, (c) a hypervascular scar, (d) a hypertrophied superior articular process (SAP) and ligamentum flavum, (e) a tender capsule, (f) an impacting facet margin, (g) a superior foraminal facet osteophyte and cyst, (h) a superior foraminal ligament impingement, (i) a hidden shoulder osteophyte. The position of the key opinion authors of the perspective article is that further clinical research will continue to validate pain generator-based treatment protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis. The endoscopic technology platform enables spine surgeons to directly visualize pain generators, forming the basis for more simplified targeted surgical pain management therapies. Limitations of this care model are dictated by appropriate patient selection and mastering the learning curve of modern MIS procedures. Decompensated deformity and instability will likely continue to be treated with open corrective surgery. Vertically integrated outpatient spine care programs are the most suitable setting for executing such pain generator-focused programs.

Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery for Lumbar Decompression or Disc Herniation

Advance in Minimally Invasive Therapy of Internal Disc Disruption

Progresses of minimally invasive interventional therapy in discogenic low back pain

Minimal incision surgery treatment for lumbar disc herniation

Minimally Invasive Incision Surgical Treatment with Lumbar Disc Herniation in Young Patients

Minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: current concepts, surgical techniques, and outcomes

MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS

Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review

Surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: MIS, endoscopic, and percutaneous techniques

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

Decompression Using Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Review

Minimally invasive spinal surgery: a historical perspective

Minimally Invasive Strategies and Options for Far-Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation

Conservative And Surgical Treatment Of Lumbar Disc Herniation

A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques and Standard Open Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-analysis

Advances in minimally invasive technique for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

Personalized Interventional Surgery of the Lumbar Spine: A Perspective on Minimally Invasive and Neuroendoscopic Decompression for Spinal Stenosis

A Novel Approach to the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniations: Indications of Simple Discectomy and Posterior Transpedicular Dynamic Stabilization Based on Carragee Classification

Treatment Gaps and Emerging Therapies in Lumbar Disc Herniation

Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Practical Overview of Current Possibilities

A study on postoperative nursing of minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation