Abstract:Abstract Objectives The use of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ) in psychological assessment of individuals with chronic pain is supported by research. The psychometric properties of the Swedish version, the IEQ-S, has not yet been evaluated. Hence, the aim was to investigate structural validity, and concurrent criterion validity of the IEQ-S against the Work Ability Index (WAI), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-SW), the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression module (PHQ-9), and the Generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were also studied. Methods Sixty-five participants, referred to a University hospital, with a pain duration over three months were consecutively sampled. They completed the IEQ-S at admission and again within six weeks. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed for the study of structural validity. Concurrent criterion validity was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Internal consistency reliability for the full IEQ-S was calculated using the Cronbach’s alpha. Test-retest reliability was calculated using an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Results The median total score (0–48, where high scores indicate high levels of injustice) at admission (test 1) was 27.0 (n=64), 25th percentile=15.3, 75th percentile=37.8, range=3–48 points. A one-factor model was supported with item-loadings between 0.67–0.92. Spearman’s correlation coefficient between the IEQ-S and the WAI (n=56) was r S =−0.46; the PCS-SW (n=63) was r S =0.68, the PHQ-9 (n=64) was r S =0.50 and the GAD-7 (n=64) was r S =0.57, p<0.01. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 (n=64). The ICC was 0.80 (n=55), with a 95% confidence interval, ranging between 0.69–0.88. Conclusions Our study supported structural validity and concurrent criterion validity of the IEQ-S against other measures of psychological constructs and work ability. It also supported the internal consistency reliability of the IEQ-S and the test-retest reliability with a retest interval up to six weeks, was good. These findings support the use of the IEQ-S as an adjunct tool to assess appraisals of injustice in patients with chronic pain who are referred to tertiary care in Sweden. The added value might be identification of those who are at risk for slow or no improvement in their pain condition over time, and sick-leave, but this has to be confirmed in future studies. Ethical committee number EPN Uppsala D-No 2016-376.

Initial Validation of the Self Experiences Questionnaire-2 in People with Chronic Pain

Potential Misfortunes in 'Making Sense': A Cross-Sectional Study in People with Chronic Pain

Further Development in the Assessment of Psychological Flexibility: A Shortened Committed Action Questionnaire (CAQ-8)

Initial Validation of an Ecological Momentary Assessment Measure of Self-Efficacy to Manage Negative Emotions

The Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire: Evaluating Aspects of Self-Reported Interoception in Patients With Persistent Somatic Symptoms, Stress-Related Syndromes, and Healthy Controls

Validation of the Committed Action Questionnaire-8 and Its Mediating Role Between Experiential Avoidance and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese University Students

Validation of a questionnaire for central nervous system aspects of joint pain: the CAP questionnaire

Development of the Sensory–Motor Dysfunction Questionnaire and Pilot Reliability Testing

Measuring Pain Catastrophizing and Pain-Related Self-Efficacy: Expert Panels, Focus Groups, and Cognitive Interviews

Further evaluation of the pain stages of change questionnaire: is the transtheoretical model of change useful for patients with chronic pain?

Psychometric assessment of the Swedish version of the injustice experience questionnaire among patients with chronic pain

[Experiential acceptance in the treatment of complex somatic symptom disorder].

Development and measurement properties of the AxEL (attitude toward education and advice for low-back-pain) questionnaire

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Pain and Coexisting Depression: A Single-Case Study

Psychometric validation and refinement of the Chinese Interoceptive Accuracy Scale (IAS) in general population and patients with chronic pain

Spontaneous self-affirmation: an adaptive coping strategy for people with chronic pain

Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in patients with subacute and chronic low back pain

Validation of a holistic composite outcome measure for the evaluation of chronic pain interventions

Development and validation of a new instrument to measure social pain

Adolescent and Parent Experiences of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Pediatric Chronic Pain: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis

Psychometric properties of the chinese version of multidimensional experiential avoidance questionnaire-30