Unipolar Voltage for Better Characterizing Left Atrium Substrates: Comparing the Predictive Efficacy for Recurrence Post Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in a Post Hoc Analysis of STABLE‐SR‐III Trial

Xiuyu Qi,Hongwu Chen,Gang Yang,Hailei Liu,Zidun Wang,Xiaohong Jiang,Chang Cui,Cheng Cai,Weizhu Ju,Minglong Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16490
IF: 2.7
2024-11-09
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Abstract:Superiority of unipolar mapping over bipolar mapping in predicting recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Background While bipolar voltage (BV) is acknowledged as an indicator of viable cardiomyocyte activation, unipolar recording has emerged as an alternative technique due to its advantage of providing a wider field of view. This study aims to compare the efficacy of unipolar voltage (UV) versus BV in predicting ablation recurrence in atrial fibrillation patients. Methods In Substrate Ablation in the Left Atrium during Sinus Rhythm Trial III, 375 patients completed the follow‐up with preserved mapping data were included in the analysis. For each patient, the mean UV and BV was obtained from the electrograms sampled in left atrium (LA). Results Totally 301 patients experience the primary endpoint within 23.0 ± 9.2 months. While both low UV and BV had significant associations with long‐term recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa), only mean UV was independently associated with the outcome. The model by UV with ablation feature had higher discriminatory power to predict ATa recurrence compared with BV model (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.858 vs. 0.757, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?