COVID‐19 mortality among Massachusetts workers and the association with telework ability, 2020

Kathleen Fitzsimmons,Malena Hood,Kathleen Grattan,James Laing,Emily Sparer‐Fine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23579
2024-03-04
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Abstract:Background Working outside the home put some workers at risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) exposure and might partly explain elevated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) mortality rates in the first months of the pandemic in certain groups of Massachusetts workers. To further investigate this premise, we examined COVID‐19 mortality among Massachusetts workers, with a specific focus on telework ability based on occupation. Methods COVID‐19‐associated deaths between January 1 and December 31, 2020 among Massachusetts residents aged 18–64 years were analyzed. Deaths were categorized into occupation‐based quadrants (Q) of telework ability. Age‐adjusted rates were calculated by key demographics, industry, occupation, and telework quadrant using American Community Survey workforce estimates as denominators. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals comparing rates for quadrants with workers unlikely able to telework (Q2, Q3, Q4) to that among those likely able to telework (Q1) were calculated. Results The overall age‐adjusted COVID‐19‐associated mortality rate was 26.4 deaths per 100,000 workers. Workers who were male, Black non‐Hispanic, Hispanic, born outside the US, and with lower than a high school education level experienced the highest rates among their respective demographic groups. The rate varied by industry, occupation and telework quadrant. RRs comparing Q2, Q3, and Q4 to Q1 were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8−1.2), 3.2 (95% CI: 2.6−3.8) and 2.5 (95% CI: 2.0−3.0), respectively. Conclusion Findings suggest a positive association between working on‐site and COVID‐19‐associated mortality. Work‐related factors likely contributed to COVID‐19 among Massachusetts workers and should be considered in future studies of COVID‐19 and similar diseases.
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?