The Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: large-scale climate features and climate sensitivity

Alan M. Haywood,Julia C. Tindall,Harry J. Dowsett,Aisling M. Dolan,Kevin M. Foley,Stephen J. Hunter,Daniel J. Hill,Wing-Le Chan,Ayako Abe-Ouchi,Christian Stepanek,Gerrit Lohmann,Deepak Chandan,W. Richard Peltier,Ning Tan,Camille Contoux,Gilles Ramstein,Xiangyu Li,Zhongshi Zhang,Chuncheng Guo,Kerim H. Nisancioglu,Qiong Zhang,Qiang Li,Youichi Kamae,Mark A. Chandler,Linda E. Sohl,Bette L. Otto-Bliesner,Ran Feng,Esther C. Brady,Anna S. von der Heydt,Michiel L. J. Baatsen,Daniel J. Lunt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2095-2020
IF: 4.3
2020-11-04
Climate of the Past
Abstract:Abstract. The Pliocene epoch has great potential to improve our understanding of the long-term climatic and environmental consequences of an atmospheric CO2 concentration near ∼400 parts per million by volume. Here we present the large-scale features of Pliocene climate as simulated by a new ensemble of climate models of varying complexity and spatial resolution based on new reconstructions of boundary conditions (the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2; PlioMIP2). As a global annual average, modelled surface air temperatures increase by between 1.7 and 5.2 ∘C relative to the pre-industrial era with a multi-model mean value of 3.2 ∘C. Annual mean total precipitation rates increase by 7 % (range: 2 %–13 %). On average, surface air temperature (SAT) increases by 4.3 ∘C over land and 2.8 ∘C over the oceans. There is a clear pattern of polar amplification with warming polewards of 60∘ N and 60∘ S exceeding the global mean warming by a factor of 2.3. In the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, meridional temperature gradients are reduced, while tropical zonal gradients remain largely unchanged. There is a statistically significant relationship between a model's climate response associated with a doubling in CO2 (equilibrium climate sensitivity; ECS) and its simulated Pliocene surface temperature response. The mean ensemble Earth system response to a doubling of CO2 (including ice sheet feedbacks) is 67 % greater than ECS; this is larger than the increase of 47 % obtained from the PlioMIP1 ensemble. Proxy-derived estimates of Pliocene sea surface temperatures are used to assess model estimates of ECS and give an ECS range of 2.6–4.8 ∘C. This result is in general accord with the ECS range presented by previous Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?