Abstract:Abstract. The CO2 source and sink distribution across Europe can be estimated in principle through inverse methods by combining CO2 observations and atmospheric transport models. Uncertainties of such estimates are mainly due to insufficient spatiotemporal coverage of CO2 observations and biases of the models. In order to assess the biases related to the use of different models the CO2 concentration field over Europe has been simulated with five different Eulerian atmospheric transport models as part of the EU-funded AEROCARB project, which has the main goal to estimate the carbon balance of Europe. In contrast to previous comparisons, here both global coarse-resolution and regional higher-resolution models are included. Continuous CO2 observations from continental, coastal and mountain sites as well as flasks sampled on aircrafts are used to evaluate the models' ability to capture the spatiotemporal variability and distribution of lower troposphere CO2 across Europe. 14CO2 is used in addition to evaluate separately fossil fuel signal predictions. The simulated concentrations show a large range of variation, with up to ~10 ppm higher surface concentrations over Western and Central Europe in the regional models with highest (mesoscale) spatial resolution. The simulation – data comparison reveals that generally high-resolution models are more successful than coarse models in capturing the amplitude and phasing of the observed short-term variability. At high-altitude stations the magnitude of the differences between observations and models and in between models is less pronounced, but the timing of the diurnal cycle is not well captured by the models. The data comparisons show also that the timing of the observed variability on hourly to daily time scales at low-altitude stations is generally well captured by all models. However, the amplitude of the variability tends to be underestimated. While daytime values are quite well predicted, nighttime values are generally underpredicted. This is a reflection of the different mixing regimes during day and night combined with different vertical resolution between models. In line with this finding, the agreement among models is increased when sampling in the afternoon hours only and when sampling the mixed portion of the PBL, which amounts to sampling at a few hundred meters above ground. The main recommendations resulting from the study for constraining land carbon sources and sinks using high-resolution concentration data and state-of-the art transport models through inverse methods are given in the following: 1) Low altitude stations are presently preferable in inverse studies. If high altitude stations are used then the model level that represents the specific sites should be applied, 2) at low altitude sites only the afternoon values of concentrations can be represented sufficiently well by current models and therefore afternoon values are more appropriate for constraining large-scale sources and sinks in combination with transport models, 3) even when using only afternoon values it is clear that data sampled several hundred meters above ground can be represented substantially more robustly in models than surface station records, which emphasize the use of tower data in inverse studies and finally 4) traditional large scale transport models seem not sufficient to resolve fine-scale features associated with fossil fuel emissions, as well as larger-scale features like the concentration distribution above the south-western Europe. It is therefore recommended to use higher resolution models for interpretation of continental data in future studies.

Contributors of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in Europe

The European Carbon Balance. Part 1: Fossil Fuel Emissions

A Recent Build-Up of Atmospheric CO2 over Europe. Part 1: Observed Signals and Possible Explanations

The European CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O balance between 2001 and 2005

Estimating greenhouse gas emissions of European cities--modeling emissions with only one spatial and one socioeconomic variable

The Consolidated European Synthesis of CO2 Emissions and Removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2018

Investigating the drivers of CO 2 emissions in the EU: Advanced estimation with common correlated effects and common factors models

The European Land and Inland Water CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, CO, CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; and N&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O Balance Between 2001 and 2005

Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences

A Roadmap for a Continental-Scale Greenhouse Gas Observing System in Europe

Surface response analysis and determination of confidence regions for atmospheric CO2: a global warming study for U.S.A. data

Climate Change-Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis and Forecast in Romania

Trends and Source Apportionment of Aerosols in Europe During 1980–2018

Comparing atmospheric transport models for future regional inversions over Europe – Part 1: mapping the atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; signals

Attributing the Increase in Atmospheric CO 2 to Emitters and Absorbers

European anthropogenic AFOLU greenhouse gas emissions: a review and benchmark data

Climate drivers of the terrestrial carbon cycle variability in Europe

Global warming is shifting the relationships between fire weather and realized fire-induced CO2 emissions in Europe

The European Carbon Balance. Part 4: Integration of Carbon and Other Trace‐gas Fluxes

Comparing Atmospheric Transport Models for Future Regional Inversions over Europe - Part 1: Mapping the Atmospheric Co2 Signals

Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Budgets of Europe: Trends, Interannual and Spatial Variability, and Their Drivers