Abstract:Analysis of data and computational modelling is central to most scientific disciplines. The underlying computer programs are complex and costly to design. However, these computational techniques are rarely checked during review of the corresponding papers, nor shared upon publication. Instead, the primary method for sharing data and computer programs today is for authors to state "data available upon reasonable request", although the actual code and data is the only sufficiently detailed description of a computational workflow that allows reproduction and reuse. Despite best intentions, these programs and data can quickly disappear from laboratories. Furthermore, there is a reluctance to share: only 8% of papers in recent top-tier AI conferences shared code relating to their publications (Gundersen et al. 2018). This low-rate of code sharing is seen in other fields, e.g. computational physics (Stodden et al. 2018). Given that code and data are rich digital artefacts that can be shared relatively easily, and that funders and journal publishers increasingly mandate sharing of resources, we should be sharing more and follow best practices for data and software publication. The permanent archival of valuable code and datasets would allow other researchers to make use of these resources in their work, and improve the reliability of reporting as well as the quality of tools. We are building a computational platform, called CODECHECK (http://www.codecheck.org.uk), to enhance the availability, discovery and reproducibility of published computational research. Researchers that provide code and data will have their code independently run to ensure the computational parts of a workflow can be reproduced. The results from our independent run will then be shared freely post-publication in an open repository. The reproduction is attributed to the person perfoming the check. Our independent runs will act as a "certificate of reproducible computation". These certificates will be of use to several parties at different times during the generation of a scientific publication. Prior to peer review, the researchers themselves can check that their code runs on a separate platform. During peer review, editors and reviewers can check if the figures in the certificate match those presented in manuscripts for review without cumbersome download and installation procedures. Once published, any interested reader can download the software and even data that was used to generate the results shown in the certificate. The code and results from papers are shared according to the principles we recently outlined (Eglen et al. 2017). To ensure our system scales to large numbers of papers and is trustworthy, our system will be as automated as possible, fully open itself, and rely on open source software and open scholarly infrastructure. This presentation will discuss the challenges faced to date in building the system and in connecting it with existing peer-review principles, and plans for links with open access journals. Acknolwedgements This work has been funded by the UK Software Sustainability Institute, a Mozilla Open Science Mini grant and the German Research Foundation (DFG) under project number PE 1632/17-1.

Ideas for Advancing Code Sharing (A Different Kind of Hack Day)

The first SPIE software Hack Day

Improving Software Citation and Credit

SciCodes: Astronomy Research Software and Beyond

Sharing Begins at Home

Advanced Techniques for Scientific Programming and Collaborative Development of Open Source Software Packages at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP)

Connecting the astronomical testbed community -- the CAOTIC project: Optimized teaching methods for software version control concepts

A Roadmap for Greater Public Use of Privacy-Sensitive Government Data: Workshop Report

Improving the visibility and citability of exoplanet research software

The 2nd Workshop on Hacking and Making at Time-Bounded Events

Playing catch-up in building an open research commons

How to organize an online conference -- Lessons learned from Cool Stars 20.5 (virtually cool)

Hack the Arctic: Transforming Data into Solutions As a Community &Amp;#160;

Software for Microscopy Workshop White Paper

A cast of thousands: How the IDEAS Productivity project has advanced software productivity and sustainability

Astronomical Software Wants To Be Free: A Manifesto

Collective Innovation in Open Source Hardware

Meanings and boundaries of scientific software sharing.

CODECHECK: An open-science initiative to facilitate sharing of computer programs and results presented in scientific publications

CODE-RADE - Community Infrastructure for the Delivery of Physics Applications

From Data to Software to Science with the Rubin Observatory LSST