Abstract:We consider the problem of learning reject option classifiers. The goodness of a reject option classifier is quantified using $0-d-1$ loss function wherein a loss $d \in (0,.5)$ is assigned for rejection. In this paper, we propose {\em double ramp loss} function which gives a continuous upper bound for $(0-d-1)$ loss. Our approach is based on minimizing regularized risk under the double ramp loss using {\em difference of convex (DC) programming}. We show the effectiveness of our approach through experiments on synthetic and benchmark datasets. Our approach performs better than the state of the art reject option classification approaches.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to effectively handle uncertain or high - risk samples in classification tasks, that is, to introduce the "reject option" in prediction. Specifically, the author proposes a new loss function - Double Ramp Loss (LDR) for learning classifiers with a reject option. This method aims to overcome the limitations of existing convex loss functions (such as the generalized hinge loss and double - hinge loss), which include strict restrictions on parameters and the linear growth characteristics in the reject region. By using LDR, the goal of the paper is to provide a tighter upper bound for the \(L_{0 - d - 1}\) loss and to be able to more accurately determine which samples should be rejected, thereby reducing the risk of misclassification.
### Main Contributions
1. **Proposing the Double Ramp Loss Function**: LDR is a continuous non - convex upper bound applicable to the \(L_{0 - d - 1}\) loss. It not only overcomes the limitations of existing convex loss functions but also keeps the loss in the reject region constant and does not grow unbounded with the scaling of parameters.
2. **Optimization Method**: Learn classifiers with a reject option by minimizing the regularized risk. This problem can be transformed into a Difference of Convex (DC) optimization problem. The author uses the DC programming method to solve this problem to ensure the effectiveness and convergence of the algorithm.
3. **Experimental Verification**: Through experiments on synthetic datasets and benchmark datasets, it is proved that the proposed method outperforms existing methods based on double - hinge loss in performance. In particular, it performs better in terms of risk (expected \(L_{0 - d - 1}\) loss) and rejection rate.
### Definition of Loss Function
The Double Ramp Loss function \(L_{DR}(f(x), y, \rho)\) is defined as follows:
\[ L_{DR}(f(x), y, \rho)=\frac{d}{\mu}\left[\left[\mu - yf(x)+\rho\right]_{+}-\left[-\mu^{2}-yf(x)+\rho\right]_{+}\right]+\frac{(1 - d)}{\mu}\left[\left[\mu - yf(x)-\rho\right]_{+}-\left[-\mu^{2}-yf(x)-\rho\right]_{+}\right] \]
where \([a]_{+}=\max(0, a)\), \(\mu\in(0, 1]\) is the slope parameter, \(d\in(0, 0.5)\) is the cost of rejection, and \(\rho\geq0\) is the parameter defining the size of the reject region.
### Experimental Results
The paper conducted experiments on multiple datasets, including synthetic datasets and real - world datasets in the UCI Machine Learning Repository. The experimental results show that the proposed LDR method can provide lower risk and lower rejection rate in most cases, especially on the synthetic dataset and the Parkinsons disease dataset.
### Conclusion
The paper proposes a new loss function LDR for learning classifiers with a reject option. Through experimental verification, the LDR method outperforms existing methods based on double - hinge loss in performance, and can more accurately identify uncertain samples while reducing misclassification. This provides an effective solution for handling high - risk classification tasks.