Abstract:Rapid development of tracking technologies allow the collection of high‐quality data on multiple simultaneously moving individuals. This, in turn, initiated the development of several methods to infer interactions among moving animals. However, the performance of these methods has not been studied systematically, especially with regard to the factors that are highly relevant for field ecologists, such as duration of the tracking period, its temporal resolution and the proportion of the tracked community. Here, we assessed the performance of three dynamic interaction indices (Coefficient of sociality, Correlation coefficient and Dynamic interaction) and two novel approaches based on step selection functions (SSF‐occurrence‐distribution and SSF‐distance). We tested these methods on the data simulated with a predator–prey system, reflecting three common types of interactions while on the move: avoidance (prey individuals fleeing from the predator), attraction (predator following and chasing prey) and neutral movement (no interactions between predator and prey). We assessed the ability of each method to correctly detect the modelled interaction type by manipulating the perceptual range of the predator, the proportion of tracked prey individuals, the temporal resolution and the duration of the tracking period. We found that the ability to correctly infer interactions increased for all methods with an increase in the perceptual range of the predator and the proportion of tracked prey individuals. In contrast, the duration of the tracking period affected the methods' performance differently: some methods (Cs and SSF‐distance) were insensitive to it, whereas the performance of other methods improved (DI and SSF‐occurrence‐distribution) and worsened (Cr) with the duration of the tracking period. The three dynamic interaction indices and SSF‐distance were rather robust to changes in data resolution. Despite using the predator–prey system as our study case, our findings are applicable to other systems in which two animals on move may interact. We formulate guidelines for field ecologists studying animal movement to select the most suitable method depending on the availability of tracking devices, the duration and resolution of the tracking they can afford, as well as perceptual ranges of study species.

Dynamical coupling during collective animal motion

Modelling group dynamic animal movement

Revealing the mechanism and function underlying pairwise temporal coupling in collective motion

Unraveling Complexity in Interspecies Interaction Through Nonlinear Dynamical Models

An information-theory approach to geometry for animal groups

A unifying framework for quantifying the nature of animal interactions

Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics

An agent-based approach for modelling collective dynamics in animal groups distinguishing individual speed and orientation

Inference of Causal Information Flow in Collective Animal Behavior

Uncovering interaction patterns of multi-agent collective motion via complex network analysis

Sparse movement data can reveal social influences on individual travel decisions

Impact of Variable Speed on Collective Movement of Animal Groups

Misconceptions about quantifying animal encounter and interaction processes

Probabilistic models of individual and collective animal behavior

Identifying differences in the rules of interaction between individuals in moving animal groups

Performance of five statistical methods to infer interactions among moving individuals in a predator–prey system

A wrap-around movement path randomization method to distinguish social and spatial drivers of animal interactions

Using Spatially Explicit Simulated Data to Analyze Animal Interactions: A Case Study with Brown Hyenas in Northern Botswana

The transition to collective motion in nonreciprocal active matter: coarse graining agent-based models into fluctuating hydrodynamics

A note on the duality between interaction responses and mutual positions in flocking and schooling

Probabilistic modeling reveals coordinated social interaction states and their multisensory bases